April 25, 2013
Bloomberg NewsEli Lilly and Co. is seeking to revoke a patent held by a Johnson & Johnson unit, arguing at a London court it might delay
availability of a potential treatment for Alzheimer’s disease.
More
April 13, 2013
J.K. WallThe Indiana University School of Medicine has launched 12 companies in the past 18 months—a burst of startup activity
the school has never seen before.
More
March 31, 2013
Bloomberg NewsJohnson & Johnson, the world’s largest seller of health-care products, won approval for the first in a new family
of diabetes drugs, giving them the edge against rivals including Eli Lilly and Co. that are developing similar medicines.
More
March 25, 2013
Associated PressEli Lilly and Co. said Monday that it has submitted a new type 2 diabetes treatment it is developing with German drugmaker
Boehringer Ingelheim to the Food and Drug Administration.
More
March 25, 2013
Associated PressFederal regulators are pressing the Supreme Court to stop big pharmaceutical corporations from paying generic drug competitors
to delay releasing their cheaper versions of brand-name drugs. They argue these deals deny American consumers, usually for
years, steep price declines.
More
March 18, 2013
J.K. WallHouse Bill 1315, which is scheduled for a Senate floor hearing on Monday, would require pharmacists to check with a patient’s
physician before automatically substituting a generic version of a biotech drug for a brand-name version.
More
March 11, 2013
J.K. WallMike Sherman, the chief financial officer at West Lafayette-based Endocyte Inc., talked about how the drug
firm’s funding partnership with New Jersey-based Merck & Co. Inc. has helped accelerate development of the company’s
pipeline, which is branching out into drugs to treat cancers of the lung, prostate and breast.
More
February 26, 2013
J.K. WallEndocyte Inc. saw its shares fall nearly 7 percent Tuesday morning after the drug development firm announced that its application
for U.S. approval of a cancer drug could be delayed another 10 months.
More
February 7, 2013
Bloomberg NewsEli Lilly said it is halting testing of experimental drug tabalumab because the studies show the medicine is not effective.
The company said it expects to take a $50 million charge in the first quarter related to the research expenses from the drug.
More
February 4, 2013
J.K. WallWith Eli Lilly and Co. set to see patents expire on its best-selling drug at year’s end, it is in the company’s
interest to say its pipeline is about to produce new drugs. But the Indianapolis drugmaker may be in a position to submit
five new drugs for regulatory approval this year.
More
January 26, 2013
J.K. WallTwo years ago, executives at AIT Laboratories “took their eye off the ball,” and watched the company’s business
plummet 29 percent in value. Now, after two years of turmoil, the drug-testing lab says it’s poised to return to the
double-digit rates of growth that made it a local star.
More
December 17, 2012
J.K. WallEli Lilly and Co. suffered a delay in its effort to bring an Alzheimer’s drug to market this month, but it also published
new research that the pharmaceutical company thinks confirms it is on the right track.
More
December 13, 2012
Bloomberg NewsEli Lilly and Co. said it discontinued a last-stage trial of experimental rheumatoid arthritis drug tabalumab for lack of
efficacy. Lilly is still evaluating the drug in the two other late-stage studies.
More
November 28, 2012
Bloomberg NewsChina takes eight years longer on average to approve drugs than other major countries, and U.S. drugmakers are looking at
ways to help speed things up, Eli Lilly and Co. CEO John Lechleiter said.
More
November 15, 2012
Associated PressEli Lilly and Co. and two other major drugmakers say they are collaborating in a global project aimed at getting patient tests
of experimental drugs up and running more quickly and efficiently.
More
November 10, 2012
Chris O'MalleyIf a biotech startup were akin to a rock band, Kristin Sherman might be the keyboardist. She’s not front-and-center
on the stage, but the ballad wouldn’t be as dynamic without her pounding the chords.
More
October 22, 2012
J.K. WallEli Lilly and Co. is continuing a string of positive yet incomplete clinical trial results, giving it a boost among investors.
More
October 19, 2012
Bloomberg NewsResearchers are set to test drugs by Eli Lilly and other companies that may prevent Alzheimer’s disease after efforts
to find a cure have been unsuccessful.
More
October 10, 2012
Bloomberg NewsEli Lilly & Co.’s solanezumab and Roche Holding AG’s gantenerumab were selected for a long-term Alzheimer’s
trial run by Washington University at St. Louis scientists seeking to block the disease’s symptoms.
More
October 8, 2012
J.K. WallEli Lilly and Co.’s Alzheimer’s drug slowed cognitive decline 34 percent in patients with mild forms of the disease,
according to an analysis of Lilly’s clinical trial data released Monday. Lilly’s share price jumped more than
5 percent on the news.
More
October 8, 2012
Bloomberg NewsEli Lilly and Co. is betting on a “broad” range of diabetes products including pills, insulins and a once-a-week
treatment to take on bigger competitors, said Enrique Conterno, president of Lilly Diabetes.
More
September 19, 2012
Associated PressPharmaceutical industry heavyweights, including Eli Lilly and Co., are teaming up to improve the way experimental drugs are
tested so they can get approved, and reach patients, faster.
More
September 4, 2012
J.K. WallIn the midst of Eli Lilly and Co.’s surprisingly positive news about its experimental Alzheimer’s drug, the company
suffered two other setbacks with former stars of its pipeline.
More
August 29, 2012
Bloomberg NewsEli Lilly and Co. halted testing on an experimental treatment for schizophrenia after the company determined the drug was
unlikely to show a benefit in patients.
More
August 27, 2012
Bloomberg NewsWhile investors supported the sliver of promise offered when Eli Lilly and Co. said its Alzheimer’s drug may slow progression
early in the disease, doctors weren’t as impressed, saying it could take years to find out for sure.
More
liek the rest of America
These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.
It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
whoa!