May 19, 2012
Indianapolis Power & Light, others say money is at stake if tighter controls are enforced.
More
May 4, 2012
Bloomberg NewsDuke Energy Corp. said first-quarter profit fell 42 percent after a regulatory settlement in Indiana increased costs and mild
weather reduced heating demand.
More
April 30, 2012
Associated PressDuke Energy Corp. has agreed to cap the cost of its troubled coal-gasification plant in southwestern Indiana at $2.6 billion,
or about $700 million less than the expected cost of construction, as part of a proposed settlement announced Monday.
More
April 28, 2012
Chris O'MalleyNew federal mercury-reduction regulations may force Indianapolis Power & Light to spend nearly $1 billion to upgrade its
coal-fired electric plants scattered around Indiana. Duke Energy is mulling everything from plant upgrades to shutting down
older units.
More
December 12, 2011
Chris O'MalleyDavid Lott Hardy, who was fired from his job as chairman of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission in 2010, is accused
of official misconduct.
More
November 3, 2011
Associated PressDuke Energy Corp.'s third-quarter earnings tumbled 30 percent, the company said Thursday, with energy consumption falling
at the same time that costs rose unexpectedly for a new plant in Indiana.
More
October 19, 2011
Chris O'MalleyA 2010 ethics scandal involving the former chief legal counsel for the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission has come back
to bite the state's biggest electric utility.
More
September 26, 2011
Associated PressDuke Energy Corp. is preparing to demolish a coal-fired power plant that's Indiana's oldest electricity-generating
plant of its kind.
More
September 20, 2011
Associated PressCharlotte-based Duke Energy and Raleigh-based Progress Energy want to combine into one company with more than 7 million customers
in the Carolinas, Florida, Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio.
More
September 16, 2011
Associated PressDuke Energy expects to close much of a coal-powered generating plant in western Indiana within the next few years.
More
August 2, 2011
Bloomberg NewsDuke Energy Corp., which is buying Progress Energy Inc. to become the largest U.S. utility owner, on Tuesday reported a second-quarter
profit after a year-ago loss.
More
July 29, 2011
Chris O'MalleyUtility officials waited seven months to act on hazardous water concerns during construction of its costly Edwardsport plant
and banked on winning an exemption, which the EPA later denied.
More
July 15, 2011
Chris O'Malley"Gross mismanagement" and improper communications with ex-regulatory chairman are among evidence in testimony to make Duke,
rather than ratepayers, swallow major cost overruns at Edwardsport power plant.
More
July 8, 2011
Chris O'MalleyThe Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor has filed a blistering rebuke of Duke Energy Corp. for the high cost of its
Edwardsport coal-gasification plant and has asked regulators to deny Duke’s request to charge ratepayers $530 million
for cost overruns.
More
June 6, 2011
Associated PressOfficials at Duke Energy don't know how soon they will be able to shut down two coal-burning units at a southern Indiana
power plant after deciding to drop a multimillion-dollar project to convert them to natural gas.
More
June 4, 2011
Chris O'MalleyIndianapolis has one of the highest concentrations of plug-in electric vehicle drivers in the nation, an industry official
says.
More
May 3, 2011
Associated PressDuke Energy Corp.'s first-quarter earnings rose almost 15 percent on strong results from its international operations
and lower corporate costs.
More
April 14, 2011
Associated PressFormer Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission counsel Scott Storms spoke out for the first time publicly on ethics charges
brought against him, denying allegations that there was a conflict of interest in how he handled cases involving Duke Energy.
More
February 21, 2011
Associated PressIndiana utility regulators will hold two additional field hearings to take public comment on Duke Energy's request to
pass along to ratepayers the $2.9 billion cost of a coal-gasification plant being built near Edwardsport in southwestern Indiana.
More
February 1, 2011
Associated PressConsumer advocates are calling for Indiana regulators to appoint an independent investigator to look into whether Duke Energy
Corp. used undue influence to win state approval for a nearly $3 billion coal-gasification plant.
More
January 10, 2011
Bloomberg NewsDuke Energy Corp. announced Monday an agreement to buy Progress Energy Inc. and put Progress CEO William Johnson in charge
of what will be the largest U.S. utility.
More
December 24, 2010
Chris O'MalleyAn ethics scandal at the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission brought down its chairman along with two top Duke Energy executives
and an IURC law judge-turned Duke employee who was at the center of the mess.
More
December 9, 2010
Bloomberg NewsDuke, the Indiana Utility Consumer Counselor and other groups will renegotiate the terms of a plan to boost rates to raise
$530 million for Duke’s Edwardsport plant, the Charlotte, N.C.-based company
More
November 23, 2010
Scott OlsonThe utility, which has about 780,000 customers in Indiana, is teaming with Japanese firm Itochu Corp. to test applications
for used electric vehicle batteries. The pilot project builds on Indiana's clean-tech initiative, Energy Systems Network.
More
November 16, 2010
Chris O'MalleyCost pressures could eat away at $2.9 billion Edwardsport project's contingency fund, leaving no room for unexpected costs
during startup and testing, Duke told the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.
More
graham. they are even better w/ roasted marshmallows and melted chocolate
Apparently ticket sales are slow too...mas emails have been sent by the speedway in a last ditch attempt to get place fans to come.
Garden Valley Veggie flavor Wheat Thins Toasted Chips. Don't judge until you try them, haters!
Doc, a few important errors in your statements:
(1) The developer is spending the CITY'S money (the city is paying for the cost of the garage), so the city can damn well insist on a quality design.
(2) The LAW requires the proposed building to comply with design standards, and insisting that people follow the law is not giving anyone the "run-around."
(3) A two-week delay to make some minimal aesthetic improvements is hardly a great imposition being imposed on the developer.
(4) If the developer would rather build a crappy building elsewhere with their own money, then they are welcome to pick up and do so.
(4) Indianapolis is a major city, not some podunk town that needs to spread its legs for any developer that throws the place a sideways glance. Indianapolis should insist on the best, not settle for junk. Accepting anything is not going to make Indianapolis grow any faster (not sure where you got that silly notion from), nor is Indianapolis a slow-growth city compared to similarly sized city's in the Midwest.
Alone. Or with cheese.