Forefront

SHELLA: Pence next up to answer residency questionsRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
Jim Shella / Special to IBJ
That means they sleep, eat, work and attend school in Arlington. Their hearts are in Indiana.
More

EARLY: Pondering angles on the primary electionsRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
Rex Early / Special to IBJ
Lugar’s ads have run Mourdock’s name ID off the chart.
More

KETZENBERGER: Struggling to be positive about campaign adsRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
John Ketzenberger / Special to IBJ
Only recently have I begun to yield to my more cynical suspicions about the motives behind the smears.
More

CHEATHAM: General Assembly needs more leaders who can work togetherRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
It is difficult to try to get along when the entire process—elections and legislating alike—are so fraught with the politics of personal attack.
More

FOLEY: Four freshman legislators are distinguishing themselvesRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
One of Jud McMillin’s attributes, which bodes well for future leadership, is his ability to comprehend and communicate complex issues.
More

WINSTON: Latino, Hispanic voters will matter in 2012Restricted Content

May 5, 2012
Robin Winston / Special to IBJ
Thirty percent of Hispanics proclaim to be liberal. Only 21 percent of the general population self identify as liberal.
More

KANE: Is it law enforcement or a circus? Hard to tellRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
Chelsea Kane / Special to IBJ
Poor oversight, mismanagement and shoddy leadership have placed Ballard, Hite and the entire IMPD in a compromising position.
More

VAUGHN: Ethics laws — enforcement = empty promisesRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
Julia Vaughn / Special to IBJ
All the ethics and disclosure laws on the books won’t make much difference if they are not aggressively and fairly enforced.
More

WOUDENBERG: Sober about immigration, the American DreamRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
Anita Y. Woudenberg / Special to IBJ
The appeal of the U.S. is precisely why we need to so scrupulously protect it.
More

HARRIS: Charter performance is strong, but accountability is criticalRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
David Harris / Special to IBJ
The autonomy charter schools receive comes with the condition that they meet high standards or face closure.
More

MEREDITH: Most charters in Indiana lag behind their public-school peersRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
Teresa Meredith / Special to IBJ
Why shouldn’t charter schools be held to the same level of accountability as their neighboring public school peers?
More

KINGSOLVER: Students need more power over IU tuitionRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
Justin Kingsolver / Special to IBJ
Students are mad, and they have good reason to be.
More

BOEHM: Once-damaged Pacers deserve more supportRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
Ted Boehm / Special to IBJ
Larry Bird and Frank Vogel have done a marvelous job.
More

DAVIS: Obama has delivered on his national agendaRestricted Content

May 5, 2012
Kathy Davis / Special to IBJ
It seems shortsighted and a little surly to treat hope like it’s a four-letter word.
More

VANE: No reason for vouchers to divide reformersRestricted Content

April 14, 2012
Robert Vane / Special to IBJ
Forgive me, but I am perplexed as to why this issue is so controversial.
More

MARCUS: Vouchers are fine, but about those details...Restricted Content

April 14, 2012
Morton Marcus
Without standards of performance, taxpayers sign blank checks while children are set up for future failures.
More

STYRING: State's voucher law on rock-solid legal groundRestricted Content

April 14, 2012
Bill Styring / Special to IBJ
The primary effect of a voucher is not to benefit the religious school. It’s to educate the child.
More

CRAWFORD: Long list of accomplishments focused on education, health careRestricted Content

April 14, 2012
I am most proud of sponsoring legislation that stopped the executions of people who are mentally retarded.
More

ESPICH: Limited government credo helped government live within meansRestricted Content

April 14, 2012
It was my goal to hold fast to the values I learned as a small-business owner back home in Wells County.
More

BONIFIELD: An economic-development reality checkRestricted Content

April 14, 2012
Jake Bonifield / Special to IBJ
It was not until the city was asked to act that latent objections emerged.
More

MUTZ: Ballard needs Unigov wisdom for educationRestricted Content

April 14, 2012
John Mutz / Special to IBJ
For traditionalists, IPS faces a perfect storm. For a thoughtful mayor, it is a perfect opportunity.
More

TAFT: Charters are stable arks amid flood of changeRestricted Content

April 14, 2012
Bill Taft / Special to IBJ
The relative autonomy of charter schools will allow them to focus on their internal success in spite of the chaos of system breakdown around them.
More

RIVERA: Dreaming up charter school possibilitiesRestricted Content

April 14, 2012
Angel Rivera
Imagine high school graduates from the Eli Lilly or the Cook Pharma Charter School of Chemistry.
More

FERGUSON: Hoosiers won't benefit from anti-Lugar fervorRestricted Content

April 14, 2012
Margaret Ferguson / Special to IBJ
Being a long-serving member of the Congress representing a state used to be a huge net plus.
More

MAHERN: Pining for an era when senators were senatorialRestricted Content

April 14, 2012
Louis Mahern / Special to IBJ
Lugar decided sound public policy trumped standing by and watching his colleagues pass a bad bill.
More
Page  << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT