May 5, 2012
Jim Shella / Special to IBJThat means they sleep, eat, work and attend school in Arlington. Their hearts are in Indiana.
More
May 5, 2012
Rex Early / Special to IBJLugar’s ads have run Mourdock’s name ID off the chart.
More
May 5, 2012
John Ketzenberger / Special to IBJOnly recently have I begun to yield to my more cynical suspicions about the motives behind the smears.
More
May 5, 2012
It is difficult to try to get along when the entire process—elections and legislating alike—are so fraught with the politics
of personal attack.
More
May 5, 2012
One of Jud McMillin’s attributes, which bodes well for future leadership, is his ability to comprehend and communicate complex
issues.
More
May 5, 2012
Robin Winston / Special to IBJThirty percent of Hispanics proclaim to be liberal. Only 21 percent of the general population self identify as liberal.
More
May 5, 2012
Chelsea Kane / Special to IBJPoor oversight, mismanagement and shoddy leadership have placed Ballard, Hite and the entire IMPD in a compromising position.
More
May 5, 2012
Julia Vaughn / Special to IBJAll the ethics and disclosure laws on the books won’t make much difference if they are not aggressively and fairly enforced.
More
May 5, 2012
Anita Y. Woudenberg / Special to IBJThe appeal of the U.S. is precisely why we need to so scrupulously protect it.
More
May 5, 2012
David Harris / Special to IBJThe autonomy charter schools receive comes with the condition that they meet high standards or face closure.
More
May 5, 2012
Teresa Meredith / Special to IBJWhy shouldn’t charter schools be held to the same level of accountability as their neighboring public school peers?
More
May 5, 2012
Justin Kingsolver / Special to IBJStudents are mad, and they have good reason to be.
More
May 5, 2012
Ted Boehm / Special to IBJLarry Bird and Frank Vogel have done a marvelous job.
More
May 5, 2012
Kathy Davis / Special to IBJIt seems shortsighted and a little surly to treat hope like it’s a four-letter word.
More
April 14, 2012
Robert Vane / Special to IBJForgive me, but I am perplexed as to why this issue is so controversial.
More
April 14, 2012
Morton MarcusWithout standards of performance, taxpayers sign blank checks while children are set up for future failures.
More
April 14, 2012
Bill Styring / Special to IBJThe primary effect of a voucher is not to benefit the religious school. It’s to educate the child.
More
April 14, 2012
I am most proud of sponsoring legislation that stopped the executions of people who are mentally retarded.
More
April 14, 2012
It was my goal to hold fast to the values I learned as a small-business owner back home in Wells County.
More
April 14, 2012
Jake Bonifield / Special to IBJIt was not until the city was asked to act that latent objections emerged.
More
April 14, 2012
John Mutz / Special to IBJFor traditionalists, IPS faces a perfect storm. For a thoughtful mayor, it is a perfect opportunity.
More
April 14, 2012
Bill Taft / Special to IBJThe relative autonomy of charter schools will allow them to focus on their internal success in spite of the chaos of system
breakdown around them.
More
April 14, 2012
Angel RiveraImagine high school graduates from the Eli Lilly or the Cook Pharma Charter School of Chemistry.
More
April 14, 2012
Margaret Ferguson / Special to IBJBeing a long-serving member of the Congress representing a state used to be a huge net plus.
More
April 14, 2012
Louis Mahern / Special to IBJLugar decided sound public policy trumped standing by and watching his colleagues pass a bad bill.
More
liek the rest of America
These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.
It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
whoa!