- Home
- NEWS
- REGIONAL
- THIS WEEK'S PAPER
- BLOGS
- Multimedia
- OPINION
- A&E
- LISTS
- PEOPLE
- EVENTS
- Classifieds
- Subscribe
Health Insurance
Franciscan among Medicare's first accountable care groups
December 19, 2011
J.K. WallFranciscan Alliance’s Indianapolis-area hospitals, along with more than 700 physicians, have been named one of the nation’s
first 32 accountable care organizations.
MoreHoosiers like parts of health reform law
December 19, 2011
J.K. WallAs it is in the rest of the country, the 2010 health reform in Indiana continues to be unpopular, unlikely to be repealed
and uncertain to put a dent in health spending, according to a poll of Hoosiers released last week by Ball State University.
MoreMedical Mutual eyes Indiana for growth
December 12, 2011
J.K. WallHealth insurer expects enrollment in its health plan to grow 30 percent next year, to nearly 21,000. And then it expects growth
of another 40 percent.
MoreBrokers' hopes dashed by feds
December 5, 2011
J.K. WallThe Obama administration on Friday let stand an earlier rule that said brokers’ fees will have to count toward a 15-percent
to 20-percent cap on administrative expenses placed on insurance plans by the 2010 health overhaul.
MoreFeds reject Indiana request for health care exemption
November 28, 2011
Associated PressThe U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on Monday rejected Indiana's bid for an exemption from federal health
care overhaul rules that require insurers selling policies to individuals to essentially dedicate 80 percent of the premiums
they collect to medical care.
MoreBrokers get hope on commissions
November 28, 2011
J.K. WallThe National Association of Insurance Commissioners passed a resolution Nov. 22 that urges Congress and the Obama administration
to exclude benefits brokers’ commissions from the new requirement that insurers spend only 15 percent to 20 percent
of the premiums they collect on administration and profits.
MoreFew employers say they'll drop health coverage
November 21, 2011
J.K. WallFew employers in Indiana say they’re likely to drop health benefits after state insurance exchanges are formed in 2014,
according to a new survey by the health benefits firm Mercer.
MoreNew York orders WellPoint to make refunds for overcharges
November 10, 2011
Bloomberg NewsWellPoint is among 11 insurers ordered to refund money to almost 600,000 New Yorkers who were charged too much for health
insurance.
MoreKaiser: Lack of competition endemic
October 31, 2011
J.K. WallIn a new study, Indiana ranked as the 19th least-competitive state for individual health insurance and the 27th least-competitive
for small-employer health insurance.
MoreInsurer Humana's quarterly profit climbs 13 percent
October 31, 2011
Associated PressHumana Inc. raised its 2011 earnings forecast, following the lead set by other big insurers, including competitor WellPoint
Inc.
MoreInsurance mandate lacks teeth, WellPoint CFO says
October 24, 2011
J.K. WallAs constitutional challenges to the health reform law’s mandate to buy insurance advance, WellPoint Inc.’s chief
financial officer reiterated that the company does not object to the mandate, just to its lack of penalties.
MoreDeficit committee could bite CNO
October 17, 2011
J.K. WallMedicare supplement policies are reportedly one of the targets of Congress’ special deficit-reduction committee—and
that’s not good news for Carmel-based CNO Financial Group Inc.
MoreJudge slaps IU Health over billing
October 17, 2011
J.K. WallThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a Marion Superior Court decision to dismiss a lawsuit by two uninsured patients who
received care at IU Health North Hospital in Carmel.
MorePrivate exchange could boost WellPoint profits
October 3, 2011
J.K. WallWellPoint Inc.'s participation in buying a majority stake of the private health insurance exchange operator Bloom Health could
help it get back to its roots as a health insurer—and make a bit more money in the process.
MoreIU embraces medical homes to cut costs
October 3, 2011
J.K. WallIndiana University announced a partnership with the Indianapolis-based IU Health hospital system that will launch four primary
care clinics in Bloomington, which can be visited for no extra charge by those enrolled in IU’s health plans.
MorePANEL: Reforms to rapidly reshape health care
October 1, 2011
Reform-induced changes dominate health care panel of health care experts convened by Indianapolis Business Journal.
MoreWill ACOs really get off the ground?
September 19, 2011
J.K. WallThe hype over accountable care organizations—something every major hospital in Indianapolis is moving to become—is
increasingly being laced with skepticism as the economics behind the idea get more scrutiny.
MoreStudy spoils common wisdom on health spending
September 12, 2011
J.K. WallThe Thomson Reuters study that showed Anderson as the highest-spending health care market in the nation also concluded that
treatment and spending vary widely from one locale to another with no clear reason based on demographics or health outcomes.
MoreAnderson's GM culture, poor health blamed for high medical costs
September 10, 2011
J.K. WallResidents of the Anderson area—when they paid with health insurance provided by an employer—spent 76 percent more
on health care in 2009 than the average American with employer health insurance, highest among all metropolitan areas in the
nation.
MoreFive individual insurers leaving Indiana
August 8, 2011
J.K. WallHartford-based Aetna Inc. and Philadelphia-based Cigna Corp., the nation’s third- and fifth-largest health insurers
respectively, have announced their departure from Indiana’s individual health insurance market.
MoreWellPoint fails to profit on consumer pullback
August 1, 2011
J.K. WallWith recession-weary Americans going to the doctor less, health insurer WellPoint Inc. should be enjoying higher profits.
But it isn’t working out that way.
MoreConsumers grow allergic to health care costs
August 1, 2011
J.K. WallDeloitte found that 20 percent of consumers have cut back on health care spending and 75 percent say the economic slowdown
has had some impact on their willingness to spend on health care.
MoreWellPoint profit falls but exceeds Wall Street expectations
July 27, 2011
J.K. WallIndianapolis-based WellPoint earned $702 million in the latest quarter after earning $722 million a year ago. It also raised
its full-year profit forecast.
MoreWellPoint insures two-thirds of Hoosier workers
July 25, 2011
J.K. WallIndianapolis-based WellPoint claimed 63 percent of all employees covered by small-group employers and 66 percent of the workers
at large-group employers, according to Seattle-based actuarial firm Milliman Inc.
MoreNot-for-profits vying with WellPoint may get $3.8B in loans
July 18, 2011
Bloomberg NewsNot-for-profits that compete with insurers such as WellPoint Inc. are eligible for $3.8 billion in U.S. financing under the
health law, and the government expects more than a third of the loans not to be repaid.
More
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
 Follow IBJ's Tweets on these topics: |
||
| @IBJNews | @Propertylines | @IBJTheScore |
| @IBJArts | @IBJHealthcare | @IBJDining |
| @IBJLists | @IBJSmallbiz | |
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
liek the rest of America
These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.
It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
whoa!