May 15, 2013
IBJ Staff and Associated PressLisa Freiman directed the opening of the Virginia B. Fairbanks Art & Nature Park: 100 Acres in June 2010 at the Indianapolis
Museum of Art. and is credited with transforming the experience of contemporary art in Indianapolis.
More
May 15, 2013
Lou HarryThe five-year program is designed to transform the Indianapolis Museum of Art into a more visitor-centered institution. The
first year will include enhancements to the upcoming Matisse show.
More
April 13, 2013
Lou HarryThe eyes of the creative world are on Ai Weiwei. The Indianapolis Museum of Art offers a chance to put your eyes on his works.
Plus, thoughts on the IBJ A&E “War Horse” road trip.
More
March 4, 2013
Dan HumanThe museum said 19 full-time employees and two part-time employees will complete their employment Monday. Eight additional
vacant positions will not be filled.
More
February 9, 2013
Dan HumanIndianapolis Museum of Art CEO Charles Venable plans to cut costs and use major exhibits to boost attendance—a strategy
aimed at reducing the museum’s reliance on investment returns and allowing its endowment to grow back to pre-recession
level.
More
January 10, 2013
Dan HumanThe new head of the Indianapolis Museum of Art has reduced the size of his executive team, including cutting a top position,
as an initial step to organization-wide restructuring.
More
December 15, 2012
Lou HarryThe Indianapolis Museum of Art proves that the mineral isn't just for pencils. Plus new shows at the Indianapolis Art Center.
More
November 10, 2012
Lou HarryAt the IMA, an Islamic art show holds glorious surprises.
More
September 22, 2012
Dan HumanSave Our Scenic Central Canal, led by local activist Clarke Kahlo, is objecting to the proposed Art2Art project that would
develop and decorate 4-1/2 miles along the Central Canal towpath.
More
September 1, 2012
Dan HumanWhat will be on the minds of A&E patrons and producers this season?
More
August 15, 2012
IBJ StaffCharles L. Venable, 52, the director and CEO of the Speed Art Museum in Louisville since 2007, was chosen to replace Maxwell
Anderson, who left the IMA in January to become director of the Dallas Museum of Art.
More
July 21, 2012
Lou HarryIndianapolis Museum of Art’s new ‘Snapshot’ exhibition examines the photography that inspired 7 artists.
Plus, ‘Cabaret’ at the Athenaeum.
More
May 26, 2012
Kathleen McLaughlinAfter three years of shrinking budgets, Indianapolis Museum of Art leaders are ready to leave the lean times behind. The IMA’s
endowment, which has covered close to 70 percent of operating expenses, is on the rebound and reached $324 million at the
end of last year.
More
May 26, 2012
Lou HarryWhat's new at the Zoo. Plus thoughts on "Forever Sung" and "Antigone."
More
May 19, 2012
Lou HarryInside the Indianapolis Museum of Art, there's African art. Outside, there's "Oedipus at Colonus."
More
May 11, 2012
Associated PressThe Indianapolis Museum of Art has received a grant to digitize, catalog, and put online a collection of materials about a
1957 modernist-style home in Columbus designed by famed architect Eero Saarinen.
More
April 7, 2012
Lou HarryThis week: a small but strong show at the IMA, plus thoughts on the Humana Festival, A&E road trips, and some Disney magic.
More
March 17, 2012
Curators have selected 24 contemporary artists to create work for hotel, to be known as The Alexander.
More
December 24, 2011
Lou HarryHighlights included the ISO's Opening Night Gala, Civic's "Drowsy Chaperone," and the opening of the Miller House.
More
December 3, 2011
Lou HarryThree shows at the Indianapolis Museum of Art display a wide range of artistic approaches.
More
November 12, 2011
IBJ StaffFinding a replacement for Maxwell Anderson could take six months to a year.
More
October 29, 2011
Lou HarryAre we better off, as arts patrons, then we were five years or so ago when Maxwell Anderson joined the Indianapolis Museum
of Art?
More
October 21, 2011
Kathleen McLaughlinMaxwell Anderson is leaving his post as CEO at the Indianapolis Museum of Art just as the institution is preparing to launch
a capital campaign it hopes will make up for financial pain inflicted by the recession.
More
October 20, 2011
Greg AndrewsAchievements during Max Anderson's tenure included opening the 100 Acres art-and-nature park as well acquiring the Miller
House and Garden in Columbus. However, he also had to grapple with fiscal challenges that led to more than $7 million
in budget cuts.
More
October 1, 2011
Sam StallEven in today's tight economy, the trend of organizing off-site team-building exercises for employees is still going strong.
More
liek the rest of America
These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.
It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
whoa!