February 8, 2013
Associated PressPurdue University is opening up intellectual property rights to student-inventors who make technological breakthroughs using
university resources.
More
November 19, 2012
Associated PressOther companies are interested in bidding for at least pieces of Hostess because of the high brand recognition and $2.5 billion
in annual revenue. Twinkies alone have brought in $68 million in revenue so far this year.
More
August 31, 2012
CMG Worldwide, an intellectual property licensing firm in Fishers, has lost a federal court appeal related to ownership of
iconic images of Marilyn Monroe.
More
April 11, 2012
J.K. WallAustralian Gold LLC, the tanning salon products company led by Steve and Tomisue Hilbert, is in a trademark dispute with a
Boston-based online retailer over the trade name Rue La La.
More
December 8, 2011
Associated PressUnlike Indiana's other major colleges, Ball State University isn't trying to buy up possible school Internet domains
names using a new suffix meant for pornography sites.
More
December 5, 2011
Associated PressIndiana University is acquiring 11 Internet domains names using a new suffix meant for pornography sites. Numerous colleges
across the nation are taking similar measures.
More
November 21, 2011
J.K. WallIndianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. is one of several Western pharmaceutical firms that see China as a linchpin of growth
in coming years, due to patent expirations and a slowdown in government reimbursements for prescription medicines in the U.S.
and European markets.
More
November 11, 2011
Scott OlsonThe Indianapolis-based pharmaceutical firm claims an Australian veterinary clinic is infringing on its Comfortis flea medication's
trademark by reselling it to U.S. consumers online.
More
October 28, 2011
J.K. WallPamela Mougin, a onetime Indianapolis photographer who now runs a studio in Colorado, filed suit this month against French
Lick Resort & Casino for copyright infringement.
More
September 10, 2011
Bloomberg NewsThe legislation would fundamentally alter the way patents are reviewed and mark the biggest change to U.S. patent law since
at least 1952.
More
June 17, 2011
Cory SchoutenA federal judge has shot down a lawsuit brought by heirs of notorious bank robber John Dillinger over the depiction of the
Dillinger name in video games based on the classic movie "The Godfather."
More
March 23, 2011
Chris O'MalleyOnline form builder says a lawsuit from Tulsa-based MacroSolve Inc. against it and three other tech firms is without merit.
More
March 12, 2011
J.K. WallA complicated legal case about trade secrets points up a down side to the success Indiana’s research universities have
had turning their research into revenue: Large legal bills can eat much of the money.
More
March 5, 2011
Chris O'MalleyBall State University is conducting a nationwide search for a president to lead a not-for-profit it launched to boost the
commercialization of the university’s intellectual property.
More
February 28, 2011
Associated PressCongress has been trying for well over a decade to rewrite patent law, only to be thwarted by the many interested parties.
More
February 26, 2011
Bob Kronemyer / Special to IBJFilching ranges from crude to highly sophisticated, experts say.
More
February 25, 2011
IBJ Staff and Bloomberg NewsCarmel-based ChaCha Search Inc., operator of an online question-and-answer site, sued Taiwanese company HTC Corp. for trademark
infringement over the planned introduction of a smartphone called the ChaCha.
More
December 6, 2010
Bloomberg NewsIndianapolis-based Republic Airways Holdings Inc. and its Frontier Airlines unit filed a trademark-infringement case against
the operator of a website offering gift cards as consumer incentives.
More
November 22, 2010
Cory SchoutenThe inventor of the world's second-best-selling card game has settled a lawsuit with Fundex Games, the Plainfield company
that markets and distributes Phase 10.
More
July 10, 2010
Associated PressThe Higher Education Opportunity Act requires schools to fight illegal distribution of copyrighted material and educate campus
communities about the issue. Schools that don't comply risk losing their eligibility for federal student aid.
More
May 24, 2010
IBJ Staff and Bloomberg NewsThe lawsuit involved the National Football League's agreement with Adidas AG's Reebok, which employs 950 people at a manufacturing
plant on the east side of Indianapolis.
More
April 30, 2010
Scott OlsonThe highest-profile addition is Jim Coles, a veteran lawyer who will co-lead his new firm's intellectual property practice.
More
March 29, 2010
A local lawyer who created the game "Chronology" alleges breach of contract, trademark infringement, use of a counterfeit
mark, unfair competition, copyright infringement, trademark dilution and forgery.
More
February 27, 2010
Scott OlsonA National Collegiate Athletic Association posse will be supplemented by local police officers in search of unlicensed T-shirts
and other memorabilia.
More
February 10, 2010
Anthony SchoettleLawyers for former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon are promising to expose financial information about NCAA's licensing
contracts the NCAA would rather keep private.
More
liek the rest of America
These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.
It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
whoa!