Junior Achievement

Appeals court rules on anonymous online comment case

February 21, 2012
Jennifer Nelson / The Indiana Lawyer
The Indiana Court of Appeals on Tuesday ordered a Marion County judge to reconsider whether The Indianapolis Star must identify an online user who posted an anonymous comment that now is part of a defamation lawsuit.
More

PNC's Stitle to chair Central Indiana Business Hall of Fame eventRestricted Content

December 31, 2011
 IBJ Staff
The event honors men and women who epitomize success in the business world.
More

Junior Achievement prevails in lawsuit brought by former executiveRestricted Content

October 8, 2011
 IBJ Staff
A former executive vice president claimed Junior Achievement had failed to remit payments to his retirement and health-savings accounts, a violation of the Employment Retirement Security Act.
More

Junior Achievement back in black after financial woes

July 27, 2011
Kathleen McLaughlin
The not-for-profit announced Wednesday morning that it has eliminated nearly $2 million in debt from six different creditors and has launched a fundraising campaign.
More

Junior Achievement says ex-CEO acted soloRestricted Content

March 5, 2011
Kathleen McLaughlin
Junior Achievement’s attorneys paint the not-for-profit's ex-CEO as something of a renegade to bolster their defense in an ongoing lawsuit by another former executive.
More

JA inducting four into Business Hall of Fame

January 13, 2011
Ceremony at Indiana Roof Ballroom on Feb. 17 will honor Michael G. Browning, David R. Frick, Stephen Russell and the late Eli Lilly.
More

After another loss, JA plans for recovery

August 13, 2010
Kathleen McLaughlin
The not-for-profit hangs its hopes on efforts including more aggressive fundraising after reporting a $389,000 deficit for its 2010 fiscal year. "It's been a rough spell," said CEO Jennifer Burk.
More

JA working its way out of real estate troublesRestricted Content

June 19, 2010
Kathleen McLaughlin
If the debt refinancing is completed, Junior Achievement would be nothing more than a tenant at the Gene B. Glick Junior Achievement Education Center.
More

Fate of $200,000 JA scholarship a mysteryRestricted Content

May 1, 2010
Kathleen McLaughlin
The turmoil that now engulfs Junior Achievement of Central Indiana likely was spawned by questions that arose in 2008 about the handling of a scholarship fund worth about $200,000.
More

Retired Junior Achievement exec files defamation suit

April 2, 2010
Kathleen McLaughlin
Former Junior Achievement CEO Jeff Miller says Mayor Greg Ballard was about to hire him as a senior policy adviser, but comments by Central Indiana Community Foundation President Brian Payne and current CEO Jennifer Burk ruined the offer.
More

Junior Achievement CEO awaits results of auditRestricted Content

March 27, 2010
Kathleen McLaughlin
Jennifer Burk, who took the helm in July, wishes she'd asked more questions when she was a board member.
More

Ex-exec accuses JA of withholding retirement funds

March 19, 2010
Victor George filed suit in federal court, alleging Junior Achievement failed to properly remit money to his retirement and health-savings accounts.
More

Contractors seek answers over Junior Achievement project

March 18, 2010
Kathleen McLaughlin
The Central Indiana Community Foundation has stopped payment on a $3 million grant to Junior Achievement because of accounting questions.
More

New Junior Achievement chief hopes to reach more kidsRestricted Content

August 10, 2009
Kathleen McLaughlin
The new CEO of Junior Achievement of Central Indiana, Jennifer Burk, said she has ideas for reinvigorating the base of corporate supporters and reaching more students with entrepreneurship programs.

More

Hands-on lab teaches students personal financeRestricted Content

January 19, 2009
Kathleen McLaughlin
When middle school students arrive at Junior Achievement's "Finance Park," they've been learning for weeks about financial institutions, taxes, and budgeting. They should be ready to take on a hypothetical life scenario, complete with assigned salary and number of children, and go to work on a budget.
More
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

ADVERTISEMENT