March 15, 2013
Associated PressSeveral people who worked in former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels' administration have landed jobs with Ivy Tech Community
College, but a school spokesman says there's no mystery about the hires.
More
March 14, 2013
Associated PressLegislative Republicans have defeated a Democratic proposal aimed at preventing a repeat of Purdue University's hiring
of Mitch Daniels as its new president while he was still governor.
More
January 25, 2013
Associated PressPurdue University President Mitch Daniels says he won't be lobbying state lawmakers on Purdue's behalf this session
because it's too soon after his departure from the governor's office.
More
January 21, 2013
Associated PressFormer Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels has started his tenure as president of Purdue University with a fact-finding tour that students
said impressed them with his willingness to engage them on changes he's considering for the university.
More
January 14, 2013
Associated PressMitch Daniels stepped into his new role as Purdue University president Monday as soon as Mike Pence was sworn in to succeed
him as Indiana's governor.
More
December 29, 2012
Mike HicksNo matter your politics, you must admit that Mitch Daniels has been the most consequential Hoosier governor in more than a
lifetime.
More
December 29, 2012
J.K. WallAs Gov. Mitch Daniels leaves office in January, there is debate about whether his policies of keeping taxes and spending low,
while pursuing alternative strategies to improve roads and schools, have been the best way to help Indiana attract and create
more high-wage, knowledge-based jobs.
More
December 16, 2012
Associated PressOutgoing Gov. Mitch Daniels would be paid $420,000 a year in his new job as president of Purdue University under an incentive-based
contract approved by the school's board of trustees' compensation committee.
More
November 26, 2012
Associated PressIndiana Gov.-elect Mike Pence has tapped one of his top campaign aides and a veteran of Gov. Mitch Daniels' administration
to lead the state's budget office.
More
October 23, 2012
Mason King
How deep are the roots in J. Murray Clark's political family tree? What still stings
from the former state GOP chairman's tenure? How does he view the party today? What about fundraising tips? Clark has
answers.
More
October 18, 2012
Associated PressIndiana's top ethics official says Gov. Mitch Daniels won't face any restrictions on his new job as Purdue University's
president.
More
October 7, 2012
Associated PressGov. Mitch Daniels is still promoting the online college known as Western Governors University just months before he becomes
Purdue University's new president.
More
October 4, 2012
Associated PressTax cuts being pushed by gubernatorial candidates are hardly guaranteed a rubber stamp from lawmakers, and a state constitutional
ban on same-sex marriage could win quick approval next year, Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma said Thursday.
More
September 22, 2012
Associated PressIndiana Gov. Mitch Daniels is meeting skeptics head-on as he educates himself about the challenges he'll face as the next
president of Purdue University.
More
September 12, 2012
Associated PressA Democratic legislator is seeking an ethics investigation into Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels' new job as president of Purdue
University.
More
August 4, 2012
Associated PressQuestions remain whether Indiana's governor will be covered by the state's "revolving door" law when he becomes president
of Purdue University. State ethics rules require a one year cool-down period for public officials after leaving office, preventing
them from working as lobbyists.
More
July 1, 2012
Associated PressOne of the biggest surprises of the announcement that Gov. Mitch Daniels would take over as Purdue University president in
January was his pledge to stop campaigning and commenting on politics until then.
More
June 23, 2012
J.K. WallColleagues of Gov. Mitch Daniels say Hoosiers should expect him to bring a familiar approach to his upcoming role at Purdue
University: Do more with less, reward performance, find creative ways to tap new pools of money, and use warm folksy charm.
More
June 23, 2012
Purdue University, known for its outstanding academic programs, has long sought a higher national profile. Choosing Mitch
Daniels as its president should go a long way toward achieving that goal.
More
June 22, 2012
Associated PressThe governor said Friday he was checking whether he could press members of the General Assembly on the university's behalf
after he becomes Purdue's president in January, because of state ethics rules that require a one-year "cool down"
for public officials after leaving office.
More
June 21, 2012
Associated PressIndiana Gov. Mitch Daniels says he'll live in the president's house once he takes over at Purdue University but will
go back and forth to his Carmel home.
More
June 21, 2012
Associated PressAs expected, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels will become the next president of Purdue University when he leaves office in January.
Purdue officials introduced Daniels as the school's new leader Thursday following a vote by the board of trustees.
More
June 19, 2012
IBJ Staff and Associated PressA board of trustees dominated by Daniels' own appointees will select him as the university's 12th president Thursday,
sources told IBJ and other news outlets. The appointment will add a dramatic new chapter to his diverse career.
More
May 12, 2012
Associated PressRepublican Mike Pence, Democrat John Gregg and Libertarian Rupert Boneham each say job creation would be "job one" if elected
governor. But their means to reaching employment goals vary from dispatching missionary-style investment gurus, to growing
more hemp and bamboo, to increasing wind-turbine manufacturing in the state.
More
April 18, 2012
Associated PressIndiana Gov. Mitch Daniels has endorsed presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney after declining for months
to publicly support any of the Republican candidates.
More
liek the rest of America
These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.
It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
whoa!