May 10, 2013
Bloomberg NewsThe drug, enzastaurin, was in the most advanced stage of testing and had been expected to generate $260 million in annual
sales by 2018.
More
April 13, 2013
J.K. WallThe Indiana University School of Medicine has launched 12 companies in the past 18 months—a burst of startup activity
the school has never seen before.
More
March 31, 2013
Bloomberg NewsJohnson & Johnson, the world’s largest seller of health-care products, won approval for the first in a new family
of diabetes drugs, giving them the edge against rivals including Eli Lilly and Co. that are developing similar medicines.
More
March 25, 2013
Associated PressEli Lilly and Co. said Monday that it has submitted a new type 2 diabetes treatment it is developing with German drugmaker
Boehringer Ingelheim to the Food and Drug Administration.
More
March 25, 2013
Associated PressFederal regulators are pressing the Supreme Court to stop big pharmaceutical corporations from paying generic drug competitors
to delay releasing their cheaper versions of brand-name drugs. They argue these deals deny American consumers, usually for
years, steep price declines.
More
February 26, 2013
J.K. WallEndocyte Inc. saw its shares fall nearly 7 percent Tuesday morning after the drug development firm announced that its application
for U.S. approval of a cancer drug could be delayed another 10 months.
More
February 7, 2013
Bloomberg NewsEli Lilly said it is halting testing of experimental drug tabalumab because the studies show the medicine is not effective.
The company said it expects to take a $50 million charge in the first quarter related to the research expenses from the drug.
More
December 17, 2012
J.K. WallEli Lilly and Co. suffered a delay in its effort to bring an Alzheimer’s drug to market this month, but it also published
new research that the pharmaceutical company thinks confirms it is on the right track.
More
November 28, 2012
Bloomberg NewsChina takes eight years longer on average to approve drugs than other major countries, and U.S. drugmakers are looking at
ways to help speed things up, Eli Lilly and Co. CEO John Lechleiter said.
More
November 15, 2012
Associated PressEli Lilly and Co. and two other major drugmakers say they are collaborating in a global project aimed at getting patient tests
of experimental drugs up and running more quickly and efficiently.
More
October 10, 2012
Bloomberg NewsEli Lilly & Co.’s solanezumab and Roche Holding AG’s gantenerumab were selected for a long-term Alzheimer’s
trial run by Washington University at St. Louis scientists seeking to block the disease’s symptoms.
More
September 24, 2012
J.K. WallYou know things are bad in the fiercely competitive pharma industry when drugmakers start turning to each other for help.
But that’s exactly what happened last week when 10 major drug companies—including Eli Lilly and Co.—joined forces to cut costs
out of clinical trials.
More
August 29, 2012
Bloomberg NewsEli Lilly and Co. halted testing on an experimental treatment for schizophrenia after the company determined the drug was
unlikely to show a benefit in patients.
More
August 11, 2012
J.K. WallOdds are long that Eli Lilly and Co.'s leading Alzheimer's drug will show positive results when its Phase 3 trial results
are released within a few weeks, but even the smallest improvement in the cognitive impairment of test patients would be a
home run for Lilly.
More
July 11, 2012
Associated PressEli Lilly and Co. said a potential treatment for acute schizophrenia failed in a late-stage study that compared patients taking
the drug to those taking a placebo.
More
May 17, 2012
Bloomberg NewsRaising good cholesterol, a goal pursued by Eli Lilly and Co. as the next milestone in cardiac care, may not cut heart-attack
risk, says a study that challenges the development of drugs that may someday generate billions of dollars in sales.
More
May 7, 2012
Associated PressA second experimental cholesterol medicine in a once-promising class of drugs meant to replace blockbusters such as Lipitor
has failed in testing, casting doubt on whether any of the drugs will ever make it to pharmacies. Eli Lilly is developing
a similar drug.
More
May 3, 2012
Bloomberg NewsMore than 20 compounds that Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc. and AstraZeneca Plc failed to turn into drugs will be tested by
U.S.-sponsored scientists in a $20 million program to see if they’ll work against ailments they weren’t aimed
at previously.
More
April 16, 2012
Associated PressEndocyte Inc. stock more than doubled in premarket trading after the company entered into an agreement to develop its ovarian
cancer treatment with pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co.
More
March 13, 2012
J.K. WallEndocyte Inc. will submit its ovarian cancer drug EC145 for European market approval in the third quarter of this year after
the European Commission granted it orphan drug status.
More
March 5, 2012
J.K. WallEndocyte Inc. can start enrolling patients again in a clinical trial of its experimental cancer drug, the company announced
Monday, clearing away a hurdle to getting the drug approved in Europe.
More
January 16, 2012
J.K. WallEli Lilly and Co. CEO John Lechleiter keeps pouring more money into research and development, even as analysts note the payoff
of such spending has dropped off 70 percent in the last decade.
More
January 9, 2012
J.K. WallIndianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. is now in the predicament of watching revenue fall as its patents on older products expire,
even as the company needs to spend more money on marketing and research to boost sales of new drugs.
More
December 31, 2011
J.K. WallEli Lilly and Co., after more than a decade of setbacks, is counting on diabetes to help it survive a string of patent losses
on other products that have begun to sap the drugmaker's sales.
More
December 13, 2011
J.K. WallShares of Endocyte Inc. plummeted more than 60 percent Tuesday morning after clinical trial results showed the company’s
experimental ovarian cancer drug led to shorter survival times than treatment with a standard cancer drug.
More
liek the rest of America
These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.
It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
whoa!