- Home
- NEWS
- REGIONAL
- THIS WEEK'S PAPER
- BLOGS
- Multimedia
- OPINION
- A&E
- LISTS
- PEOPLE
- EVENTS
- Classifieds
- Subscribe
Tax Caps
Residents decry Fortville's big annexation plans as land grab
April 29, 2013
Andrea Muirragui DavisProperty owners southeast of Geist Reservoir are vowing to fight involuntary annexation of a 9-square-mile area by the town
of Fortville, which would add $53.5 million to its property tax base.
MoreReport backs simpler Indiana local tax system
November 13, 2012
Associated PressA new report on Indiana's local income taxes urges state legislators to simplify a system that has seven types of taxes
and a two-year lag before the money collected by the state is distributed to local governments.
MoreCouncilor seeks review of city's TIF-district strategy
February 11, 2012
Cory SchoutenBrian Mahern, a Democrat on the City-County Council, plans to propose a study commission to examine the effectiveness of TIF
districts, how property tax caps will affect them, and ways to increase transparency for the complicated financing vehicles.
MoreTax caps lead to painful budget cuts in some counties
April 6, 2011
Associated PressIndiana homeowners and businesses have seen their tax bills cut by more than $655 million since the General Assembly approved
property tax caps in 2008. But the savings have been tough for some local governments.
MoreIndiana voters OK property tax cap amendment
November 2, 2010
Associated PressIndiana voters have overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment that will make property tax limits more permanent.
MoreIndiana voters deciding outcome of big GOP push
November 2, 2010
IBJ Staff and Associated PressIndiana voters headed to the polls Tuesday amid Republican hopes for big gains in the state's congressional delegation
and Legislature, but it wasn't immediately clear whether voters were turning out in the numbers the party had hoped for.
MoreTax-cap amendment means change for local government
November 2, 2010
Francesca JaroszCuts in services, higher fees and consolidation of government units are possibilities, but advocates for the constitutional
amendment say long-term certainty about property tax rates could benefit the economy.
MoreVoters expected to OK property-tax cap amendment
October 31, 2010
Associated PressA recent poll found that more than 60 percent of likely voters support the proposed constitutional amendment, and some of
the measure's biggest opponents have given up the fight.
MoreEDITORIAL: Don't abandon basic services because of tax caps
May 1, 2010
IBJ StaffThe property tax caps that are all but sure to become part of the Indiana constitution after a voter referendum
this November
are definitely good politics—and might prove to be good policy. We won’t know for sure until we see what becomes
of two property-tax funded entities that are starving as the caps fully phase in.
MoreMarion County library may close six branches
April 8, 2010
Kathleen McLaughlinThe Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library could close up to six branches or reduce their hours in order to close a budget
shortfall.
MoreProperty tax caps heading to Indiana voters
January 19, 2010
Associated PressThe Indiana Senate has given final approval to a proposal that would allow voters to decide whether property tax limits belong
in the state constitution.
MoreFEIGENBAUM: Democrats start to embrace constitutional amendment
January 9, 2010
Ed FeigenbaumWhat changed over the last year to make House Democrats so eager to allow Hoosier voters to amend the property-tax caps
into the Indiana Constitution? The calendar.
MoreAssessor predicts 2010 property tax bills will be on time
December 30, 2009
Peter SchnitzlerIndianapolis property tax bills, paid in two installments due in May and November, should be sent without delay for the first
year since
2006.
MoreFEIGENBAUM: Expect uncertainty in the 2010 General Assembly
December 19, 2009
Ed FeigenbaumAbout the only certainty for the upcoming legislative session is that it will be over in March.
MoreCash-strapped mayors may tap owners of tax-exempt property
December 12, 2009
Kathleen McLaughlinA group of mayors led by Tom Henry of Fort Wayne and Greg Ballard of Indianapolis is seeking new sources of revenue to replace
the millions they’ll lose because of property tax caps.
MoreIndiana cities association seeking local tax options
October 26, 2009
Associated PressThe association representing 470 cities and towns wants lawmakers to pass legislation that would give municipalities the authority
to adopt local option income taxes.
MoreEDITORIAL: City government in financial bind
September 5, 2009
IBJ StaffThe solution to the property tax fiasco that swept Republican Mayor Greg Ballard into office in 2007 is making his job harder,
and
it could lead to his undoing.
MoreStimulus talk creates uncertainty at Statehouse
February 9, 2009
Ed FeigenbaumStimulus talk continues to dominate discussion at the Indiana Statehouse, creating indecision for lawmakers who were supposed
to be devoting their full attention to assembling a two-year budget under difficult economic circumstances.
MoreTax caps thrill homeowners, assessments chill businesses
December 29, 2008
Peter SchnitzlerSoaring property taxes were arguably Indiana's biggest problem in 2007. In 2008, the Legislature approved property tax caps
as a solution. But because the caps haven't been implemented, debate is still raging over the consequences the caps will have
for local governments and whether they should be made permanent.
MoreTax reform fallout worries biz interests
March 24, 2008
Peter SchnitzlerProperty tax reform is now Indiana law. Hoosier homeowners are thrilled. But many corporate leaders grumble the historic deal
was brokered on the backs of business. Topping their concerns is the new 3-percent property tax cap for commercial and industrial
properties, which they fear will slow business expansions and discourage companies from moving headquarters to the state.
MoreProperty tax-cap concern growing
July 17, 2006
Peter SchnitzlerLocal officials say a new state law that caps property tax bills for homeowners and businesses will send the city into a financial
tailspin if legislators don't modify it in an upcoming session.
MoreSponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
 Follow IBJ's Tweets on these topics: |
||
| @IBJNews | @Propertylines | @IBJTheScore |
| @IBJArts | @IBJHealthcare | @IBJDining |
| @IBJLists | @IBJSmallbiz | |
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
liek the rest of America
These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.
It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
whoa!