Knight's ESPN deal draws reaction

February 29, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
KnightNot surprisingly, not everyone is thrilled with former Indiana University and Texas Tech basketball coach Bob Knight joining ESPN’s in-studio crew for its NCAA March Madness coverage. Knight’s move to the media side—or what Knight himself has from time to time called the dark (or is it dim) side—has some wondering if Knight will take cheap shots on-air at NCAA boss Myles Brand, who fired him when Brand was president and Knight was coach at Indiana. Others have suggested that Knight might use the occasion to shoot darts at his former employers at Indiana. Others are just tired of hearing from Knight altogether.

Kevin Hench, Fox Sports contributor, today wrote: “Oh, joy. The guy who could delight himself with juvenile and profane poetry about the press corps has joined the media. For a guy who occasionally shoots his hunting partners or assaults his beloved sons, I guess this latest spasm of schizophrenia, joining his most despised institution, should come as no surprise. Despite his avowed hatred of the press — or maybe because of it—ESPN has hired Bobby Knight as a studio analyst for the NCAA tournament. Here's hoping His Almighty Blowhardness doesn't take screen time away from the insightful—and, yes, affable—Tom Brennan and Doug Gottlieb.”

Do you think Knight will be a positive addition to or a detraction from ESPN’s coverage?
  • I'm sure Coach Knight will take time to talk about Brand. What has Brand contributed to college basketball? Almighty? A loud mouth with three national titles and 900+ probably wont have anything insightful to say.
  • Nice picture of Knight.... Another ploy by the media to always depict Knight in an angry manner....

    How many pictures of other coaches are used while they are screaming?
  • I find Knight to be entertaining. I don't always agree with him, but he's entertaining. I just hope they never had him on a live feed without a delay. That's going to be one busy bleeper.
  • If they could find any pictures of Knight with his mouth closed and calm.........I am sure they would publish them.
  • Coach Knight will make a very positive addition to the ESPN basketball team with his insights, observations and sense of humor. That the above comments came from FOX Sports only makes sense as that network features NO NCAA hoops coverage. Reads like sour grapes to me. Say what you will about Coach Knight but nothing can take away from his 900+ wins, 3 NCAA titles and 40+ years in coaching. No other NCAA coach brings those credentials to the broadcast booth.
  • Bob Knight is a very smart man when it comes to basketball and I hope that he is classy enough to overcome this terrible expectation. His input will be positive as far as the play of the game, but as we have all learned with Bobby Knight... You just never know!

    And to all of those of think Bobby Knight should disappear into the night. I am sorry to say it, but I don't think he is going anywhere... As much we don't want to admit it he was a staple in college basketball for a long time and this is allowing him to stay on the main stage.
  • What is the value of bringing his past experience to the tournment coverage? Wasn't he fired from his last 4 jobs? Who really cares what a coach has to say. Why don't they hire some retired players, or trainers, or some one who really understands college basketball like the AD's of the different schools? Every winner of the final four comments that the most help came from the AD's involvement in the game. I think Kevin from Fox sports hit it on the head, what does Bobby Knight know about modern day basketball?

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1