IBJNews

Lawmakers eye tougher Indiana daycare rules

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Operators of unlicensed daycare facilities that receive public money would have to undergo training or ensure they had adequate staffing under proposals being considered by lawmakers ahead of the 2014 legislative session.

The moves to improve the safety of unlicensed day cares come as concern rises over the number of deaths in Indiana’s child-care facilities. An investigation by the Indianapolis Star found that 15 of the 21 daycare deaths since 2009 occurred in unlicensed or illegal facilities. Nine of those deaths were reported in 2012.

“If you take government money, then you should be held to a higher standard,” said Rep. Tim Wesco, R-Osceola, chairman of a study committee looking at child-care safety.

Indiana already requires home daycare providers who look after six or more children not related to them to be trained in health and safety precautions and follow strict safe-sleep procedures. But homes with five or fewer are unlicensed and are not subject to state scrutiny.

Lawmakers this year began requiring unlicensed daycares that receive federal dollars to have written discipline policies, ensure that toilets flush properly — and that employees wash their hands — and employ only primary caregivers who are at least 18 years old.

They also began requiring all licensed day cares, and unlicensed ones that receive federal money, to conduct national criminal background checks on all employees and volunteers every three years.

The new measures being considered would expand state rules for more than 1,000 daycares but would not affect those that are exempt.

Advocates say Indiana needs tougher rules. Ten states license any home that takes in one child, and at least 39 are more aggressive about safety than Indiana is, according to Child Care Aware of America.

Dianna Wallace, executive director at the Indiana Association for the Education of Young Children, said Indiana needs to step up its regulations.

“If they are caring for two or more unrelated children … they need to be regulated,” she said. “Period.”

Lawmakers are receptive to measures that would improve safety but question whether licensing more homes would prevent deaths.

“Ultimately, I don’t see us as being able to solve every problem we have out there with legislation,” Wesco said.

He noted that small providers are essential resources in many rural counties.

“If the small provider has to go through all the paperwork and the challenge of becoming licensed, are they going to even bother with it? And what does that do with parents’ access to finding someone to watch their kids while they’re at work?”

Indiana currently has 27 daycare inspectors and spends $2.5 million a year to license and inspect the more than 4,700 facilities under state oversight.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT