Lawmakers may study declining gambling revenue

Associated Press
May 11, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana lawmakers this summer could consider how to address increased gambling competition from neighboring states as revenue from riverboats continues to drop.

The money the state collects from casino taxes has dropped from a peak of nearly $876 million in 2009 to about $752 million in fiscal 2013, according to figures from the Indiana Gaming Commission. Indiana's three casinos near Cincinnati have seen big declines since a downtown casino opened in the Ohio city last year.

In recent years, Indiana's casino industry has pleaded with state legislators for economic protection from the increasing state competition. But many lawmakers have resisted, saying the casinos should try to survive on their own.

Senate President Pro Tem David Long told the Evansville Courier & Press that lawmakers realize the state is at a seminal moment with its casinos and that he supports assigning the issue to a summer study committee.

"The whole issue seems to revolve around the expansion of gaming and what do you interpret that to mean," Long said.

Final decisions on the study committees will be assigned later this month. Long said the committee would explore the declining revenue from riverboats, which is down 7 percent, or $20 million, from projections for the fiscal year.

In April, Indiana casino revenue dropped to $192 million, down from $207 million in April 2013.

Indiana's casinos have pumped billions of dollars into state coffers since they first opened in the mid-1990s. The money has also bolstered local budgets, paying for road improvements, capital projects, salaries and other needs.

Leaders in places like Evansville say reductions in casino revenue could force them to delay buying new police cars or paving streets.

"From our end, the city would just like to see the revenue consistent," said Evansville City Controller Russell Lloyd. "We don't want to see anything that would make revenue go down."

State Sen. Vanetta Becker, R-Evansville, said she supports a summer study of the gambling challenges.

"It is a fact of life that communities and the state rely on that revenue to fund a portion of government services, so I think we ought to look at it to see if there are ways to help the industry and help communities and help the state and decide whether or not doing so is a good public policy," Becker said.


  • Gig is up
    The gig is up on gaming revenue. Look, to the extent that you attract tourism from other states it's a net income gain. But most other states are likewise pursuing gaming - there's little reason to travel to Indiana for it. The limited pie of money is now being cut up by more and more states. Gaming may provide tax revenue... but it's not much of a job creator. You want to capture the gaming dollars people would otherwise spend on gaming, but not encourage it. That same entertainment money spent on virtually anything else would provide more economic activity and jobs.
  • Expand Gaming
    This was foreseeable. As more states allowed gaming, especially Ohio, it was only a matter of time before our revenues declined. We need to expand gaming. We're either a gaming state or we're not. This tap dance with river boats and "electronic" gaming at the racetracks is a fool's errand. Let's allow gaming companies to build real, land-based casinos with live dealers. Revenues will return and more jobs will be created.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ