UPDATE: Emmis shares rise after report

Anthony Schoettle
May 12, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Emmis Communications Corp. Chairman Jeff Smulyan was as upbeat as ever about the company's earnings report today, but this time there might be greater reason for his optimism.

Revenue at the Indianapolis-based media company rose 9 percent, to $85.8 million, in the fiscal fourth quarter despite having posted a $13 million loss.

Much of the loss in the quarter ended Feb. 29 was caused by a $21.2 million charge for its broadcast license. Emmis' operating income was $18.6 million, compared to $15 million a year earlier.

Investors were optimistic, too, bidding up the price of Emmis stock to $3.11 a share, a 6.1-percent increase.

Smulyan insisted Emmis and the radio industry as a whole are on the way up.

"Our industry is also fighting back," he told analysts in a conference call this morning. "I've seen more progress from our industry in the last six months than I've seen in the last 15 years."

Smulyan added that he expects Emmis radio stations to outperform those in its markets in the coming year. "We feel we've turned a corner, but it's more than that," he said.

The company also will be bolstered by innovative partnerships with companies such as Apple and other interactive initiatives, Smulyan added, including one to get radio tuners placed in cell phones.

Emmis saw big gains in its overseas operations, with a 31-percent revenue increase for the fourth quarter and 22 percent for the year at its properties in Hungary, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Belgium.

Its publishing division, which now represents 27 percent of total revenue, was up 4 percent for the quarter and 5 percent on the year.

Emmis officials were at a loss to explain rough months in the domestic radio sector in March and May. Domestic radio trended down 6 percent in the first quarter of 2008, Emmis officials said.

During the fourth quarter, national radio ads were down 10 percent and local ad revenue was down 7 percent.

Several top 10 advertising categories also saw declines during the fourth quarter, including automotive, down 11 percent, and media, declining 16 percent. Movies, retail, wireless, health care and beverages also were down. The restaurant, entertainment and financial institution categories saw small gains in the quarter.

But Smulyan said changes in markets such as New York, Los Angeles and Indianapolis have the company headed in the right direction.

"Obviously we're in the back drop of a challenging economy, but we're starting to see some positive signs," Smulyan said.

For more, go to NewsTalk.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why should citizens rates increase forever to basically reduce Dukes cost to operate in the future? They will have no meter readers, no connect/disconnect personnel and will need fewer lineman to handle the same number of customers. Add to that the ability to replace customer service by giving detailed information electronically. Why do we have to subsidize the cost cutting measures of a Public Utility?

  2. In response to Sassafras, I have to ask if you relocated directly from Bloomington to Carmel? First, as you point out, Carmel is 48 square miles. Do you think it’s possible that some areas are more densely developed than others? That might explain traffic density in some places while others are pretty free moving. Second, your comment “have you ever been to Chicago--or just about any city outside of Indiana?” belies your bias. I don’t know, Sassafras, have you never been to Nashville, Columbus, OH, Cincinnati, St. Louis, Kansas City, Denver, Phoenix? They’re not a lot different in density than Indy. One more thing…I understand these comment sections are for expressing opinions, so those of us just looking for facts have to be patient, but you mention “low-density” Indy. How many cities in the US comprise 400 square miles with about 10% of that still being agricultural? Those facts certainly can impact the statistics.

  3. With all the past shady actions of Duke with utility regulators, one wonders do they really need such a huge amount? Concerned regulators not protecting ratepayers from the aggressive Duke monolith.

  4. I thought that had to be the way it was but had to ask because I wasn't sure. Thanks Again!

  5. I could be wrong, but I don't think Butler views the new dorm as mere replacements for Schwitzer and or Ross.