IBJNews

Premier Properties to be liquidated

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A judge reclassified the bankruptcy status of Premier Properties USA today, clearing the way for a U.S. trustee to take hold of the company and begin selling its assets.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Basil H. Lorch III approved a motion to convert the bankrupcty case to Chapter 7 from Chapter 11, ending Premier founder Christopher P. White's hopes of resurrecting the Indianapolis development firm.

White had been trying to raise money to save the 15-year-old company, which developed numerous high profile retail projects, including the Metropolis mall in Plainfield.

Premier sought bankruptcy protection April 23, listing debts of more than $2.8 million to 20 creditors - not including millions of dollars in unpaid bills related to specific properties. White and his company also face a slew of lawsuits, alleging unpaid bills, defaulted loans and check fraud.

Today's decision means a trustee now will take control of the company to liquidate any of Premier's remaining assets.

That probably isn't much, said Henry Efroymson, an Ice Miller attorney who represents Atlanta-based Dominion Capital Management LLC, a Premier creditor that took control of most of its properties last month.

"If there's going to be a distribution to creditors, it's going to be very small," Efroymson said. "There isn't much left ... this was a management company."

During the hearing, Efroymson also asked that Dominion Capital be given full access to Premier's records. He said his client had received the "lion's share" of records on Premier's properties, but needed to review the company's computer hard drives to retrieve the rest of the data.

Some of those hard drives have been moved to White's home, said William J. Tucker, Premier's bankruptcy attorney. But Tucker said a backup of the files has been made and he said that Premier has not hidden or removed anything.

Still, Efroymson said he was concerned, since the trustee won't take control of the files until Monday.

"The concern now is there is nobody in place ensuring the data remains on the computers and servers," he said.

The decision today also won't provide much relief to Premier's former employees, many of whom have not been paid for at least eight weeks.

"I don't see that there's going to be any funds for former employees," Efroymson said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT