IBJNews

BREAKING: Madoff scam may cost KSM clients $15M

Norm Heikens
December 16, 2008
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis investment firm KSM Capital Advisors disclosed today that the scandal unfolding around New York hedge fund manager Bernard Madoff could cost its clients as much as $15 million.

Making matters worse: KSM's parent, accounting firm Katz Sapper & Miller LLP, could lose up to 1 percent of its book value as a result of its own investments in the alleged Ponzi scheme. The firm would not put that loss in dollar terms.

KSM Managing Director Peter Reist said the firm began calling clients with the bad news on Friday, and that the past few days have been one of the worst stretches of his life.

"Many of them are devastated and shocked," Reist said. "It's very tragic."

KSM didn't put it or its clients money directly into Madoff-affiliated funds. Rather, it put money into a fund that invested in another fund that was invested with Madoff.

Fewer than 50 KSM clients were affected, Reist said.

Today's disclosure is the first local announcement of a loss through Madoff, though more may be in the offing as investors assess the carnage.

Katz Sapper is in good company. Firms ranging from Japan-based Nomura Holdings to Royal Bank of Scotland have said they lost money through Madoff.

I
nvestigators believe Madoff, the former chairman of the NASDAQ stock market, may have orchestrated one of the world's largest financial frauds. Madoff told investigators he had taken as much as $50 billion from investors.

Most of the $500 million KSM manages is for individuals; most of those people are in the Indianapolis area.

KSM parses clients' investments among a number of investment firms and investment vehicles. One of those firms is Redmond, Wash.-based Future Select Portfolio Management Inc. Future Select in turn invested through Tremont Capital Management, which in turn placed the money with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC.

Reist held out hope that some of the losses can be recovered.

For more, go to NewsTalk.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT