IBJNews

BREAKING: Madoff scam may cost KSM clients $15M

Norm Heikens
December 16, 2008
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis investment firm KSM Capital Advisors disclosed today that the scandal unfolding around New York hedge fund manager Bernard Madoff could cost its clients as much as $15 million.

Making matters worse: KSM's parent, accounting firm Katz Sapper & Miller LLP, could lose up to 1 percent of its book value as a result of its own investments in the alleged Ponzi scheme. The firm would not put that loss in dollar terms.

KSM Managing Director Peter Reist said the firm began calling clients with the bad news on Friday, and that the past few days have been one of the worst stretches of his life.

"Many of them are devastated and shocked," Reist said. "It's very tragic."

KSM didn't put it or its clients money directly into Madoff-affiliated funds. Rather, it put money into a fund that invested in another fund that was invested with Madoff.

Fewer than 50 KSM clients were affected, Reist said.

Today's disclosure is the first local announcement of a loss through Madoff, though more may be in the offing as investors assess the carnage.

Katz Sapper is in good company. Firms ranging from Japan-based Nomura Holdings to Royal Bank of Scotland have said they lost money through Madoff.

I
nvestigators believe Madoff, the former chairman of the NASDAQ stock market, may have orchestrated one of the world's largest financial frauds. Madoff told investigators he had taken as much as $50 billion from investors.

Most of the $500 million KSM manages is for individuals; most of those people are in the Indianapolis area.

KSM parses clients' investments among a number of investment firms and investment vehicles. One of those firms is Redmond, Wash.-based Future Select Portfolio Management Inc. Future Select in turn invested through Tremont Capital Management, which in turn placed the money with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC.

Reist held out hope that some of the losses can be recovered.

For more, go to NewsTalk.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. RKW's comments read like a modern "Chicken Little". As a Raintree resident for many years, "Yes, I'm ready for this." Matter of fact, I welcome The Farm because it's a development that compliments our town, brings new and desirable shopping & dining closer (specialty grocer, upscale shops, micro brew pub, etc), offers upscale condos for empty nesters who want to stay in Zionsville, is being planned and constructed by local, well-reputed firms and, of course, provides desirable non property tax benefits. We all knew the Pittman's were going to develop their property sooner than later. That one of the Pittman's will continue to live on the property helps assure The Farm will be everything promised. This also sets a standard for other developers as to the quality of future developments - which should keep an ugly Walmart at bay for decades. As we've no meglomaniac mayor, I seriously doubt Zionsville would ever aspire to over-priced statues or subsidized retail rents. And we already have a very nice public theater, the Zionsville Performing Arts Center, that meets our cultural needs quite nicely.

  2. Do we add (or subtract) these from the bounty we recieve from RTWFL, Daylight Savings Time, corporate tax giveaways, and the crack job IEDC is doing?? Or is Mike going to blame these on Mitch?

  3. Who makes Tater Tots? They would be a good sponsor, because $3 Million for the alleged "Greatest Spectacle In Racing" is taters. Tiny, tiny taters. But at least they are making up something of the losses accumulated over the years in this dying sport. Buttock in seat is certainly not doing it, nor eyeball on TV, as evidenced by the lack of both.

  4. We loved lakehouse and think the Arbor Village would be a great location. It is less than 2 miles from over 1000 rooftops in the 225,000 to over 1 million range. Many people could use the great fishers trail system to bike or walk there. Just an idea Scotty -- but maybe something closer to 3 Wiseman would good. The only microbrew in area is Ram (boring)

  5. True, it's an ESPN production, but ESPN is just another name for ABC Sports, or what used to be ABC Sports since ABC Sports no longer exists as a name. ESPN=ABC Sports= ESPN. ESPN is, according to Forbes "the world's most valuable media property" worth $40 billion. Despite that, they fired 400 people this week.

ADVERTISEMENT