IBJOpinion

DINING: Let 'er Ripple at new eatery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

About a dozen years ago, I dined at Broad Ripple Steakhouse where, as our dessert was delivered, our server said, “Don’t take too long, I have people waiting for the table.”

As a diner who holds a grudge, I never went back.

BRSH is gone now (not because of the lack of my business, I’m sure) and, in its stead, is The Ripple Inn, a handsome eatery with a creative menu. Unfortunately, the ghosts of bad customer service haven’t been completely exorcised.
 

Entree at The Ripple Inn Strawberry Grouper shines at the new Ripple Inn. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

The staff gave my guest a hard time when she requested that our reserved table not be right by the kitchen. Rather than accommodate, the host tried to negotiate (“You won’t even notice the kitchen”)—not the best approach for building repeat business.

We stayed, though, and were happy we did. The initial glitch gave way to a beautifully presented parade of dishes delivered to a table not so close to the kitchen.

Carving a memorable dining identity is difficult, and the Ripple Inn manages that right off the bat with an almost-mandatory selection of Ripple Skins. Yes, they are potato skins, but it’s what’s atop them that counts. We dove right in and went for the Lobster ($9), which brought five skins with oven roasted tomato/arugula/goat cheese/crème fraiche along with the crustacean pieces. As good as one should expect from a signature offering.

The Parmesan-Pink Peppercorn Potato Dumplings ($9), also on the appetizer menu, were subtle nearly to a point of inconsequence. On the other hand, if there’s a better Lobster Bisque ($8) in the city, point me there. The delicious Ripple Inn version comes complete with a lobster-scallion wonton that takes it over the top.

For entrees, Porridge of the Gods ($14) may not reach the heights of Mount Olympus, but it is a risotto-done-right with butternut squash, Indiana sweet corn and more. The highlight of the Duo of Duck ($20) was its shallot bread pudding base and lingonberry sauce. And the Strawberry Grouper ($22) was a full-of-flavor preparation as artful as it was delicious.

And while nobody encouraged us to leave in any hurry, our own timetable forced us to depart before we could indulge in Peanut Butter Pie ($6), Lemon Meringue “Baked Alaska” ($8) or tableside-prepared Bananas Foster for Two ($17).•

__________

Fourth in a month-long series of reviews of double-letter restaurants.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Awww.
    Well, boo-hoo-hoo. If you don't like having a table near the kitchen, you should have arranged that while making your reservation. If you don't want the staff to give you a hard time, then don't give them a hard time. Gosh, what a unique concept. Mutual respect.
  • What's With The Ongoing Service Issues At This Place?
    We had the same issue with seating and wrote this in a review: http://www.yelp.com/biz/the-ripple-inn-indianapolis. Unfortunately, we thought the food could have issued some tweaking, as well. Perhaps the Inn should just eliminate the undesirable table squeezed between the kitchen door and hallway to the restrooms and make its customers happy. I agree that this is the key to repeat business, which is what will lead to greater profitability and long-term success--rather than squeezing two more unhappy patrons at a bad table in a not-so-packed restaurant.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT