IBJOpinion

Let's focus on medical errors

November 7, 2009
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

Debra Smith’s column in your Oct. 19 [Focus section] needs some clarification and correction. She addresses potential medical-malpractice reform and argues vigorously for a “peer-review” screening of medical-malpractice cases before they go to court.

What you failed to point out is that Indiana has had such a screening mechanism in place for 30 years. In Indiana, medical-malpractice cases are reviewed by a medical review panel consisting of three doctors before they are filed in court.

She then argues for a cap on economic and punitive damages on the grounds it will reduce the cost of health care. The data do not support her position. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the proposed cap would reduce the cost of medical liability insurance by about 10 percent. Since liability insurance premiums make up about 2 percent of the cost of health care, the savings would be about 0.2 percent. Your $100 medical bill would be reduced by 20 cents—not quite enough to buy a cup of coffee.

The real issue should be patient safety. There is a silent epidemic in this country. Over 100,000 people a year die of preventable medical mistakes. Twice as many people die of medical negligence as die in automobile accidents. The economic loss from those errors dwarfs any savings from caps. The focus in any health care reform should be on preventing the mistakes that cause those deaths.

__________

John Muller 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT