DC: Dinner with Harry Hamlin

June 18, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
"Hi, I'm Harry," he says, shaking my hand.

And when he sits down at our table, a woman next to him asks, "Who do you write for?"

That's the standard first question here at the American Theatre Critics Association conference in Washington. But, in this case, it's not the right question.

Because Harry isn't a critic. He's an invited guest of a different sort for this pre-show dinner at the Shakespeare Theatre. Ten years or so ago, Harry played Henry V with this acclaimed theater company, both on its mainstage and for its hugely popular free summer Shakespeare series.

He also danced with the stars, clashed with the Titans, and defined our image of the Los Angeles lawyer.

Harry Hamlin isn't the only notable Hollywood actor who considers the Shakespeare Theatre a home. Indiana native Avery Brooks--of "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine" and, more relevantly here, "Othello," "Oedipus" and "Tamburlaine"--has joined another table.

Hamlin--who now has an alternative energy business and a chain of women's clothing stores--considers himself semi-retired from acting while his two young kids are growing up. "When I come back, I might be ready for 'Lear,'" he says.

I asked about theater legend Laurence Oliver, who he appeared with in the less-than-legendary film "Clash of the Titans," Hamlin says, "He knew I revered him. And he apologied because he thought that, by being in this film, his stock had tone down."

My only exposure to Hamlin's theatrical side was in his LA Theatreworks recording of "A View from the Bridge." LATW gathers actors with theater chops for short-rehearsal-period, one-weekend-of-performances, script-in-hand productions of plays. It then broadcasts them on radio and releases them on DVD. (Visit here for more info). Turns out Hamlin was there during the development of the company, when it was trying to mount a production of Hamlet but faced everyone-wants-to-be-the-star challenges.

This dinner isn't about Hamlin, though. It's an introduction to the Shakespeare Theatre, led by the charasmatic Michael Kahn, who has remarkably made the Bard's work--and not just the "hits"--commerical here in D.C. And not just when a familiar star such as Brooks or Hamlin is playing a lead.

The company's mainstage is housed in a brand-spanking new theater, where we catch an "Anthony and Cleopatra" free of gimmicks, name stars, or a blunt directorial stamp.

Clarity seems to be key here, but so is an embracing of the scale of the work. The famed romance takes place in the midst of war and a thinly populated stage just wouldn't cut it.

Is it a play I think should be on the short list of most-produced Shakespeare work? No. But I'm glad I saw it and, more importantly, I'm glad I saw it here, in the hands of a director, actors and designers who have as much respect for the play and the audience as they do for their visions.
  • When I lived in DC, I found a few art-oriented highlights that I wanted to visit again and again;
    -- The Arena Stage -- I can't remember specifically what I saw there, only that it blew me away.
    -- The Freer Gallery -- although it's a part of the Smithsonian group, this gallery is often overlooked. But it's got a superb collection -- wonderfully put together and presented. A beautiful set of Thomas Wilmer Dewing works, and Whistler's Peaecock Room, in all its eccentricity.
    -- The Phillips Collection -- When I moved into a little apartment around the corner from the Phillips, I had no idea how incredible my neighbor's art was. I went back again and again, occasionally catching a concert on Sundays.
    -- Dumbarton Oaks -- amazing gardens offering a quiet retreat from DC ... and yet close to Georgetown's restaurants and other attractions.
    -- The Torpedo Factory in Alexandria -- a collections of artists' studios and galleries. Funky and fun, a model for places like the Stutz.
    -- Old Town Alexandria -- worth a trip in itself. Great history, dining, shopping, art and an amazing sense of community.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1