DC: Dancing with Presidents

June 18, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
We're on the stage of the National Theatre, rich in history but on the verge of irrelevance. With a mere 1675 seats, it's difficult to compete for tours and concerts with the Kennedy Center and other larger houses.

This is the stage where Lyndon Johnson showed up during a curtain call for "Hello, Dolly!" and danced with Carol Channing. This is the theater where not-yet President Franklin Pierce got into a brawl with a fellow audience member while Julius Booth performed. This is the theater where JFK showed up at 10:30 because he was back at the House watching the Liston/Patterson fight. After the show (the musical "Mr. President", he asked Jackie if the first act was as bad as the second.

The stories are being shared by Thomas A. Bogar, Ph. D., an assistant professor of theatre history at Hood College and the author of "American Presidents Attend the Theatre," a book about the theater-going of every U.S. Pres. (No, Bush the younger isn't the weakest in this regard--that honor goes to Polk, who went to one play and walked out at intermission.)

A while back in this blog, I brought up the fact that public office candidates these days rarely are seen at arts events. But according to the personable Bogar, we've had a number of passionate theatergoers as chief execs, including Lincoln, Wilson and J.Q. Adams.

Later, on the stage, a group of Washington theater folks--two actors, a director/producer, and a designer, field questions about why they settled on Washington. The general consensus: It's like a huge ensemble company with 50 stages.

Is it really that wonderful here? It's difficult to find the cracks just by visiting. But of the three productions I've seen so far, I've been as impressed with the audiences as I am with the productions. For there to be a truly vibrant theater scene, a town needs an audience willing to take majors leaps of faith. There has to be a willingness to follow an artistic vision, allowing for crushing failures in order to increase the chance of major breakthroughs.

"It is impossible for us to offend our audience," says Howard Shalwitz, the visionary behind the 28-year-old Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company. He says, a bit amazed rather than boastful, that he can do an entire season of plays by writers that no one has ever heard of. Even when he works with names familiar to theater folks--Wallace Shawn, Sarah Rule, Nicky Silver--he pushes them for their most cutting-edge work. Audiences have come to expect that, helping Woolly Mammoth grow to a point three years ago when it could move into an architecturally praised space under a stack of luxury condos in a high-rent downtown area.

The play we see is David Grimm's "Measure for Pleasure," an attempt to fuse a 21-century sensibility on a Restoration comedy.

While it has plenty of laughs, some bordering-on-brilliant wordplay, a few surprisingly effective tone shifts, and an oddly moving, very conventional ending, I found myself thinking that the audience was way ahead of it. The risque didn't seem risky enough. The ground on this one already seemed broken. But it did leave me wanting to see more from the Mammoth--and impressed with a city that can nurture it.

Later in the evening, we catch The Shakespeare Theatre Company's take on the real thing--a production of Moliere's "The Imaginary Invalid," complete with the music and dance that would have been part of its original production. Inventively directed and expertly played, particularly by star Rene Auberjonois (who you may know from his stints on "Benson" and "Boston Legal"). He's made for Moliere the way Jason Robards is ideal for Eugene O'Neill.

And now, to sleep. If I'm up on time in the morning, it's off to theaters in Virginia and Maryland. If I miss the bus, it's museum-hopping time.

Either way.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I could be wrong, but I don't think Butler views the new dorm as mere replacements for Schwitzer and or Ross.

  2. An increase of only 5% is awesome compared to what most consumers face or used to face before passage of the ACA. Imagine if the Medicaid program had been expanded to the 400k Hoosiers that would be eligible, the savings would have been substantial to the state and other policy holders. The GOP predictions of plan death spirals, astronomical premium hikes and shortages of care are all bunk. Hopefully voters are paying attention. The Affordable Care Act (a.k.a Obamacare), where fully implemented, has dramatically reduced the number of uninsured and helped contained the growth in healthcare costs.

  3. So much for competition lowering costs.

  4. As I understand the proposal, Keystone would take on the debt, not the city/CRC. So the $104K would not be used to service the $3.8M bond. Keystone would do that with its share.

  5. Adam C, if anything in Carmel is "packed in like sardines", you'll have to show me where you shop for groceries. Based on 2014 population estimates, Carmel has around 85,000 people spread across about 48 square miles, which puts its density at well below 1800 persons/sq mi, which is well below Indianapolis (already a very low-density city). Noblesville is minimally less dense than Carmel as well. The initiatives over the last few years have taken what was previously a provincial crossroads with no real identity beyond lack of poverty (and the predictably above-average school system) and turned it into a place with a discernible look, feel, and a center. Seriously, if you think Carmel is crowded, couldn't you opt to live in the remaining 95% of Indiana that still has an ultra-low density development pattern? Moreover, if you see Carmel as "over-saturated" have you ever been to Chicago--or just about any city outside of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT