IBJOpinion

Health reform stories should include private-practice docs

July 13, 2009
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Letters To The Editor

I read with interest IBJ’s [June 29 story] focusing on health care reform. I was not surprised by the exclusion of opinions from “real” private-practice physicians. No offense to the “doctors” who were interviewed but they were not physicians that currently work in private practice and I doubt that they ever did.

I would suggest that IBJ contact at least five-10 private-practice physicians in the area to get a better perspective on the real workings of health care. To borrow a phrase from one of my partners, we are the “trench workers” of medicine. Not to mention small-business owners that are on the front line of the health care debate. I would think that any debate on health care should involve the opinions of these private practitioners and would be of great interest to IBJ and the business community.

It’s not IBJ’s fault that we are overlooked. I certainly didn’t read that any of the directors, CEOs and administrators interviewed mentioned us either. We are constantly being squeezed by the government (Medicare, Medicaid), private insurance and the hospital systems in the quest for making health care more “affordable,” controlling costs and improving quality.

In reality, it is more about profit. Profit for the insurers and hospitals, not the physicians. On a patient-by-patient basis, we are forced to take less and less every year, despite the escalating costs of doing business. This means that we have to have more patient contacts on a daily basis just to cover our costs, let alone make our income.

We don’t get a raise every year or a bonus when we treat patients more efficiently, treat an illness or even save a life. Indeed, we are constantly being told which procedures or treatments can or more likely cannot be done because it is too expensive or not profitable. These mandates are even required by these so-called “non-profit” entities.

Eventually the private practitioner will go by the wayside. It is the goal of all area hospital systems to have all of its physicians employed by that system in some form or fashion. It is happening at an alarming rate as physicians eventually tire of the struggle of being business owners and employers and gladly welcome the “freedom” of letting the hospital run their practice. However, there will be a price to pay for both the physician and, more important, the patient.

I therefore invite IBJ to get the real scoop on health care and what proposed reforms will mean to the practice of medicine and the patients we serve.

Dr. Jonathan P. Gentile
Indiana Spine Group

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT