Health reform stories should include private-practice docs

July 13, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

I read with interest IBJ’s [June 29 story] focusing on health care reform. I was not surprised by the exclusion of opinions from “real” private-practice physicians. No offense to the “doctors” who were interviewed but they were not physicians that currently work in private practice and I doubt that they ever did.

I would suggest that IBJ contact at least five-10 private-practice physicians in the area to get a better perspective on the real workings of health care. To borrow a phrase from one of my partners, we are the “trench workers” of medicine. Not to mention small-business owners that are on the front line of the health care debate. I would think that any debate on health care should involve the opinions of these private practitioners and would be of great interest to IBJ and the business community.

It’s not IBJ’s fault that we are overlooked. I certainly didn’t read that any of the directors, CEOs and administrators interviewed mentioned us either. We are constantly being squeezed by the government (Medicare, Medicaid), private insurance and the hospital systems in the quest for making health care more “affordable,” controlling costs and improving quality.

In reality, it is more about profit. Profit for the insurers and hospitals, not the physicians. On a patient-by-patient basis, we are forced to take less and less every year, despite the escalating costs of doing business. This means that we have to have more patient contacts on a daily basis just to cover our costs, let alone make our income.

We don’t get a raise every year or a bonus when we treat patients more efficiently, treat an illness or even save a life. Indeed, we are constantly being told which procedures or treatments can or more likely cannot be done because it is too expensive or not profitable. These mandates are even required by these so-called “non-profit” entities.

Eventually the private practitioner will go by the wayside. It is the goal of all area hospital systems to have all of its physicians employed by that system in some form or fashion. It is happening at an alarming rate as physicians eventually tire of the struggle of being business owners and employers and gladly welcome the “freedom” of letting the hospital run their practice. However, there will be a price to pay for both the physician and, more important, the patient.

I therefore invite IBJ to get the real scoop on health care and what proposed reforms will mean to the practice of medicine and the patients we serve.

Dr. Jonathan P. Gentile
Indiana Spine Group


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.