Lilly awards pay increases to top executives

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. Chairman and CEO John C. Lechleiter received $16.4 million in total compensation last year, a 33.6-percent increase. The rest of Lilly’s executive team got an average 25.4-percent pay hike.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker gave shareholders a first look at its 2009 executive pay in the preliminary version of the company’s proxy statement, released Monday morning. Lechleiter's $16.4 million total was a $4.1 million increase over the $12.3 million he got in 2008.

IBJ uses the Associated Press formula to calculate executive pay. It gauges the value of compensation such as stock and options grants at the time they are awarded, not the time they are cashed in.

The majority of pay for the top five Lilly executives came in the form of stock-based awards. Each executive received a pair of “Performance Awards” and a “Shareholder Value Award.” The executives will receive annual opportunities to cash in those stock-based awards in each of the next three years.

For example, $11.3 million of Lechleiter’s total came in three stock-based awards worth $3.75 million each, granted on Dec. 15. Those grants have one-, two- and three-year performance periods.

Lilly spokesman Mark Taylor noted that the company’s decision to give two performance awards to each of its top executives was a one-time event. Lilly historically has split its equity grants halfway between annual Performance Awards, which are tied to earnings-per-share growth, and Shareholder Value Awards, which are tied to three-year stock price appreciation.

In future years, Taylor said, Lilly’s Performance Awards will be tied to a two-year earnings-per-share target. The company awarded each top executive an extra Performance Award in 2009 to account for the one-year transition and maintain continuity to the new system.

“From a governance standpoint, we’re doing the right thing,” Taylor said. “We’re trying to lengthen the period of time, to have a longer-term performance period around those Performance Awards.”

Dr. Steven M. Paul, who is retiring this month as Lilly's executive vice president of science and technology and president of Lilly Research Laboratories, was the company’s second-highest paid executive last year, but he received the smallest pay increase on the management team. In 2009, Lilly awarded Paul total compensation worth $7.1 million, a 17.1-percent increase over the $6.1 million he received the year before.

Executive Vice President Bryce D. Carmine, who also serves as president of the company’s Established Markets Business Unit, received total compensation of $6.9 million last year, 23 percent more than the $5.6 million he received in 2008.

Chief Financial Officer Derica W. Rice, who also is executive vice president of global service, received the largest pay hike—34.8 percent, from $4.9 million in 2008 to $6.7 million last year.

Senior Vice President and Executive Counsel Robert A. Armitage had a 26.5-percent pay hike in 2009. His total compensation increased from $3.9 million in 2008 to nearly $5 million last year.

New York-based Frederic W. Cook and Co. served as Lilly’s independent executive compensation consultant. Director Karen N. Horn led the board’s five-member Compensation Committee, which met eight times last year.

Lilly paid more for board guidance last year than it did in 2008, largely because of the addition of two new board members and the retirement of another. Last year, the company gave 13 independent directors total compensation worth $3.3 million. In 2008, Lilly gave 12 independent directors total compensation worth $2.9 million. The majority of Lilly’s board compensation was stock-based. Each director received a stock award worth $145,000.

Lilly’s profits have grown by double-digits each of the past two years. In 2009, the company’s operations generated a profit of $4.9 billion, up 16 percent from the year before, including extraordinary gains and losses.

In 2008, the company recorded a loss due to its $6.5 billion purchase of the New York-based biotech firm ImClone Systems Inc. But excluding that and other extraordinary items, Lilly’s profits totaled $4.2 billion, up 14 percent from the previous year.

Investors, however, are nonplussed by Lilly’s big profits. That’s because they have their eyes fixed on November 2011, when Lilly’s U.S. and European patent on its bestseller Zyprexa expire. Cheaper generics are expected to steal away the majority of Zyprexa’s $4.9 billion in annual sales.

Lilly faces a similar fate on four other bestselling drugs between now and 2014. All told, it could lose more than half its current revenue. And it has no molecule in its pipeline with promise to fill the gap before the bleeding begins.

Fears of the looming sales shortfall, exacerbated by a slew of setbacks on bringing new drugs to market, have sent Lilly’s stock price tumbling. Even counting Lilly’s substantial dividend, investors suffered a 21 percent loss in value in 2008 and another 6 percent loss in 2009.

Lilly shares rose 26 cents, to $34.78 apiece, on Monday.


  • Lilly Ha
    Interesting....The stock market doesn't seem to think that Lilly's executives did as good a job as the executive compensation consultant and the "independent" directors (with average pay of $1/4 million each) thought they did. Maybe the directors would like to buy my stock for the $60/share that it was once worth. Any guess how I'll vote my proxy?
  • pay raises and pay cuts
    Nice to know the top dogs got raises while they cut the regular Lilly employees pay by 10% last year!
  • Lilly Pay
    After reading how much more everybody was paid, I took my daily hit of Zyprexa and do feel better and am now very happy that those exec got 25%+ raises. Got to leave to start my 3rd job.
  • Zyprexa profits
    Eli Lilly has been around for a century,and a proven performer.I am waiting to see how they resolve the costly Zyprexa saga.

    Great news that Eli Lilly is posting profit,as a Zyprexa damage claimant who got diabetes from it I know that Lilly can afford to pay me my settlement.

    Daniel Haszard

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So much for Eric Holder's conversation about race. If white people have got something to say, they get sued over it. Bottom line: white people have un-freer speech than others as a consequence of the misnamed "Civil rights laws."

  2. I agree, having seen three shows, that I was less than wowed. Disappointing!!

  3. Start drilling, start fracking, and start using our own energy. Other states have enriched their citizens and nearly elminated unemployment by using these resources that are on private land. If you are against the 'low prices' of discount stores, the best way to allow shoppers more choice is to empower them with better earnings. NOT through manipulated gov mandated min wage hikes, but better jobs and higher competitive pay. This would be direct result of using our own energy resources, yet Obama knows that Americans who arent dependent of gov welfare are much less likely to vote Dem, so he looks for ways to ensure America's decline and keep its citizens dependent of gov.

  4. Say It Loud, I'm Black and Ashamed: It's too bad that with certain "black" entertainment events, it seems violence and thuggery follows and the collateral damage that it leaves behinds continues to be a strain on the city in terms of people getting hurt, killed or becoming victims of crimes and/or stretching city resources. I remember shopping in the Meadows area years ago until violence and crime ended make most of the business pack you and leave as did with Lafayette Square and Washington Square. Over the past 10 to 12 years, I remember going to the Indiana Black Expo Soul Picnic in Washington Park. Violence, gang fights and homicides ended that. My great grandmother still bears the scares on her leg from when she was trampled by a group of thugs running from gun fire from a rival gang. With hundreds of police offices downtown still multiple shootings, people getting shot downtown during Black Expo. A number of people getting shots or murdered at black clubs around the city like Club Six on the west side, The Industry downtown, Jamal Tinsley's shot out in front of the Conrad, multiple fights and shootings at the skating rinks, shootings at Circle Center Mall and shooting and robberies and car jackings at Lafayette Mall. Shootings and gang violence and the State Fair. I can go on and on and on. Now Broad Ripple. (Shaking head side to side) Say It Loud, I'm Black and I'm Ashamed.

  5. Ballard Administration. Too funny. This is the least fiscally responsive administration I have ever seen. One thing this article failed to mention, is that the Hoosier State line delivers rail cars to the Amtrak Beech Grove maintenance facility for refurbishment. That's an economic development issue. And the jobs there are high-paying. That alone is worth the City's investment.