IBJNews

Lilly committed to China despite IP woes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. will continue to build its business in China, even as it faces intellectual property theft, Lilly CEO John Lechleiter told Dow Jones Newswires in an interview published Nov. 20.

Indianapolis-based Lilly is one of several Western pharmaceutical firms that see China as a linchpin of growth in coming years, due to patent expirations and a slowdown in government reimbursements for prescription medicines in their traditional U.S. and European markets.

China remains a small market for Lilly. It generated $320 million in sales for the company in 2010, just 1.3 percent of its $23 billion in sales worldwide. But China is expected to become the world’s third-largest pharmaceutical market this year and is projected to pass Japan and become the No. 2 market by 2015, according to IMS Health, a Connecticut-based pharmaceutical research firm.

In the third quarter, Lilly’s revenue from China grew 31percent, compared to 9 percent worldwide. Lilly drugs such as Zyprexa, which lost its western-market patents this year, and even Prozac, which has been off-patent for a decade, have been growing sales rapidly in China.

While the firm is also targeting markets in South Korea, Taiwan and Australia, China and Japan "are clearly our focus in Asia," Lechleiter told Dow Jones.

Lechleiter joined a group of other CEOs in a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Hawaii this month. He said China has shown "remarkable progress" in anti-counterfeiting efforts, though he acknowledged that intellectual property theft remains a problem.

"The importance of intellectual property protection is understood by the highest levels of government in China," Lechleiter said, adding that officials realize stronger enforcement will be needed to protect China's own nascent industries.

Whereas in the past, intellectual property concerns made Lilly more reluctant than its peers to move aggressively into China, under Lechleiter the company has made major investments there. It has more than 3,000 employees in the country, and just opened a diabetes research center there to explore the unusual ways diabetes affects Chinese patients.

China's rapid economic growth has produced a burgeoning middle class, which now has the wealth to eat the diets and live the sedentary lifestyles common to westerners. The result is that more and more Chinese are developing the chronic illnesses that afflict prosperous societies, such as diabetes, heart disease and cancer.

"That plays into our strengths, and it means that we can expect to succeed with a portfolio of medicines in China that will look very similar to or the same as medicines that we have elsewhere in the world," Lechleiter said.

Lilly also is pressing Chinese authorities for more timely regulatory approval of innovative drugs, he said, and is pushing for betting representation of its drugs on health plan formularies in China, which can be biased in favor of generic or traditional therapies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT