IBJNews

Lilly plans more investment in two-in-one drugs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co.’s newest plan for breakthrough biotech drugs relies on an old business strategy: package deals.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker on Tuesday plans to announce a new multimillion-dollar investment to develop drugs that act like two medicines in one.

Lilly did not disclose the amount of money it is spending on the initiative. The company is unveiling the plans at a convention in Washington, D.C.

The idea is to engineer the DNA of proteins so that one molecule can hit two or more targets in a patient’s cells. Lilly says it already has used protein engineering to develop several of these multi-specific therapeutics. Now it wants to move them into human testing.

Lilly hopes the new drugs also could be engineered to produce fewer side effects to patients.

To put the effort into action, Lilly intends to hire as many as 40 workers between its biotechnology center in Indianapolis and its molecular engineering unit in San Diego. About 35-40 employees now work on the two-in-one drug initiative.

Also, scientists will do a review of Lilly’s library of proteins developed in previous decades of research—most of which were never brought to market—to see if any could be good candidates to be engineered into a multi-specific drug.

Lilly is aiming at some high-dollar diseases, mainly diabetes and cancer, where patients often have to take multiple medications to treat their disease.

“With our extensive biologics experience, we can now engineer new therapies where one medicine essentially provides the benefit of two. This could produce real benefits for patients, health care professionals and payors,” said Tom Bumol, Lilly’s vice president of biotechnology discovery research.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

  2. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

  3. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

  4. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

  5. David Copperfield!

ADVERTISEMENT