Lilly sales, profit drop but beat analysts' expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Second-quarter sales and profit swooned at Eli Lilly and Co., but the drugmaker beat the lowered expectations of Wall Street analysts.

Indianapolis-based Lilly lost 17 percent of its revenue during the quarter, compared with the same period a year ago, as U.S. patents expired on two of its bestselling drugs: Cymbalta in December and Evista in March.

Lilly pulled in $4.94 billion during the quarter, slightly higher than the $4.90 billion analysts were expecting, according to a survey by Thomson Financial.

Profit fell 39 percent, to $733.5 million. Earnings per share fell to 68 cents per share from $1.16.

Analysts expected earnings per share of 65 cents in the most recent quarter.

In a press release, Lilly said it was able to keep profit larger by reducing operating expenses 11 percent during the quarter.

“Lilly's second-quarter results reflect a substantial decline in revenue and earnings resulting from recent patent expirations,” CEO John Lechleiter said in a prepared statement. “At the same time, new product approvals and impending launches give us great confidence that Lilly is poised for growth in the years ahead.”

During the second quarter, Lilly launched a new cancer drug, Cyramza, onto the U.S. market. It is approved to treat gastric cancer.

Also, Lilly and its partner, Germany-based Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, won approval from European regulators to launch Jardiance, an anti-diabetes medicine.

Lilly lowered its full-year profit forecast 5 cents a share, to a range of $2.67 to $2.75. That was due to a $45 million drug development agreement it signed this month with U.K.-based Immunocore Ltd.


  • they are maintaining profitablility with offshore IT H1B's
    In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............