IBJNews

Report: Local apartment market strong in 2010

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis apartment market rebounded last year as the expiration of the federal homebuyers’ tax credit and stricter mortgage standards led more people to rent.

Occupancy in the entire metropolitan area grew nearly 1.7 percent to 90.8 percent in 2010, according to the latest annual apartment market overview compiled by local apartment brokerage Tikijian Associates.

“It’s really a good time for the apartment market,” said George Tikijian, a firm principal. “All of this is somewhat mitigated by the fact that if you don’t have a job, you can’t pay for an apartment. It could be stronger if you see sustained job growth.”

The downtown apartment market performed particularly well last year. The downtown occupancy rate grew 1.6 percent to 91.7 percent and average monthly rent increased 3.3 percent to $805.

Tikijian attributed the downtown growth to increasing enrollment at IUPUI and more students choosing to live close to campus.

Among the new apartment complexes in the area is Cosmopolitan on the Canal, and more are scheduled to be built. A $30 million, 253-unit student housing project at 1201 Indiana Ave. is under construction by West Lafayette-based Trinitas Ventures. In addition, locally based Buckingham Cos. is set to start construction this year on The Avenue, a 210-unit complex at 10th Street and Indiana Avenue.

New downtown units are leasing at monthly rates between $1.30 and $1.40 per square foot, about 30 percent to 40 percent higher than their suburban counterparts.

And older units in the metro area constructed before the 1960s—a category that includes downtown rehab projects—are just as expensive as those built the past 20 years.

“Downtown is definitely the strongest market occupancy-wise and rent-wise,” Tikijian said.

Overall occupancy in the metropolitan area managed to grow even though the local market absorbed 4,200 new units, which is well above normal, the report said.

Still, in a city with 130,000 units, the number of new apartments that came on the market last year is not a “huge” amount, Tikijian insisted, given the lack of demand for apartment living in recent years.

“It’s not like we’ve overbuilt,” he said. “It’s that everybody and their brother was buying a home. It really sucked a lot of the demand out of the market.”

Home-buying was buttressed earlier this year by a federal law providing an $8,000 tax credit for first-time buyers of homes purchased or under contract through April 30. It also created a $6,500 tax break for existing homeowners who had lived in their current residence for at least five years and bought another home.

Weak economic conditions affected the apartment market somewhat, however. While occupancy rates in Indianapolis increased, overall rent in the metro area slipped 0.4 percent to $668.

The weakest market was the east side. Occupancy rates there slipped 0.6 percent to 84.8 percent, and rent rates dropped 1.4 percent to $570.

The north side boasted the highest occupancy rate—92.7 percent.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT