IBJNews

Report: Local apartment market strong in 2010

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indianapolis apartment market rebounded last year as the expiration of the federal homebuyers’ tax credit and stricter mortgage standards led more people to rent.

Occupancy in the entire metropolitan area grew nearly 1.7 percent to 90.8 percent in 2010, according to the latest annual apartment market overview compiled by local apartment brokerage Tikijian Associates.

“It’s really a good time for the apartment market,” said George Tikijian, a firm principal. “All of this is somewhat mitigated by the fact that if you don’t have a job, you can’t pay for an apartment. It could be stronger if you see sustained job growth.”

The downtown apartment market performed particularly well last year. The downtown occupancy rate grew 1.6 percent to 91.7 percent and average monthly rent increased 3.3 percent to $805.

Tikijian attributed the downtown growth to increasing enrollment at IUPUI and more students choosing to live close to campus.

Among the new apartment complexes in the area is Cosmopolitan on the Canal, and more are scheduled to be built. A $30 million, 253-unit student housing project at 1201 Indiana Ave. is under construction by West Lafayette-based Trinitas Ventures. In addition, locally based Buckingham Cos. is set to start construction this year on The Avenue, a 210-unit complex at 10th Street and Indiana Avenue.

New downtown units are leasing at monthly rates between $1.30 and $1.40 per square foot, about 30 percent to 40 percent higher than their suburban counterparts.

And older units in the metro area constructed before the 1960s—a category that includes downtown rehab projects—are just as expensive as those built the past 20 years.

“Downtown is definitely the strongest market occupancy-wise and rent-wise,” Tikijian said.

Overall occupancy in the metropolitan area managed to grow even though the local market absorbed 4,200 new units, which is well above normal, the report said.

Still, in a city with 130,000 units, the number of new apartments that came on the market last year is not a “huge” amount, Tikijian insisted, given the lack of demand for apartment living in recent years.

“It’s not like we’ve overbuilt,” he said. “It’s that everybody and their brother was buying a home. It really sucked a lot of the demand out of the market.”

Home-buying was buttressed earlier this year by a federal law providing an $8,000 tax credit for first-time buyers of homes purchased or under contract through April 30. It also created a $6,500 tax break for existing homeowners who had lived in their current residence for at least five years and bought another home.

Weak economic conditions affected the apartment market somewhat, however. While occupancy rates in Indianapolis increased, overall rent in the metro area slipped 0.4 percent to $668.

The weakest market was the east side. Occupancy rates there slipped 0.6 percent to 84.8 percent, and rent rates dropped 1.4 percent to $570.

The north side boasted the highest occupancy rate—92.7 percent.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT