Local home construction plummets again

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Home-building permits filed in the Indianapolis area fell by more than 40 percent in February compared with the same month last year, mirroring a national trend of weak demand for new single-family houses.

In the nine-county metropolitan region, the number of building permits filed last month fell to 201, a decline of 43 percent from February 2010, according to the latest permit data from the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis.

Home-building activity was flat or down in every county last month except Hancock, where just 11 building permits were filed. Only four were filed there in the same month last year.

Just 39 building permits were filed in Marion County, a decrease of 55 percent.

Home construction was strongest in Hamilton County, though the number of building permits fell by 52 percent, to 72.

In the first two months of the year, building permit activity in the area is down 38 percent from the same time in 2010.

Nationally, builders broke ground last month on the fewest homes in nearly two years, a reflection of declines in home prices and diminished demand that has made it difficult for them to compete.

The Commerce Department said Wednesday that home construction plunged to a seasonally adjusted 479,000 homes last month, down 22.5 percent from the previous month. It was lowest level since April 2009, and the second-lowest on records dating back more than a half-century.

The building pace is far below the 1.2 million units a year that economists consider to be healthy.

Millions of foreclosures have forced home prices down and more are expected this year. Tight credit has made mortgage loans tough to come by. And some potential buyers who could qualify for loans are hesitant to enter the market, worried that prices will fall further.


  • Not good
    This is not a good thing, as it reflects a poor economy. How can lower prices be good for current homeowners?
  • Good
    I, for one, feel no sympathy for the builders. Irresponsible mass-tract building has harmed our region by promoting sprawl rather than reinvestment in our inner city. Perhaps if the housing supply remains limited, individuals might begin to move back into the inner-ring suburbs and downtown proper.
  • swing
    The pendulum always swings back the other way. What will demand look like and where will home-buyers choose to live? How much will they spend? Anybody's guess...
  • Shortage in coming years?
    I read an analsis by a well respected economist yesterday that stated that building developement is so slow in the region, particularly the lack of any planned new developments, that there will be a possibilty of a shortage of lots in 3-4 years in this region.

    Point was that builders are not developing any new communities, but rather snatching up vacant lots in established communtities and doing all buildling there. And since it taks at least 2 years to go from planning to building a new development, a shortage is on the horizon.

    Might be the only thing that helps the price of established homes.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.