Local home construction plummets again

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Home-building permits filed in the Indianapolis area fell by more than 40 percent in February compared with the same month last year, mirroring a national trend of weak demand for new single-family houses.

In the nine-county metropolitan region, the number of building permits filed last month fell to 201, a decline of 43 percent from February 2010, according to the latest permit data from the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis.

Home-building activity was flat or down in every county last month except Hancock, where just 11 building permits were filed. Only four were filed there in the same month last year.

Just 39 building permits were filed in Marion County, a decrease of 55 percent.

Home construction was strongest in Hamilton County, though the number of building permits fell by 52 percent, to 72.

In the first two months of the year, building permit activity in the area is down 38 percent from the same time in 2010.

Nationally, builders broke ground last month on the fewest homes in nearly two years, a reflection of declines in home prices and diminished demand that has made it difficult for them to compete.

The Commerce Department said Wednesday that home construction plunged to a seasonally adjusted 479,000 homes last month, down 22.5 percent from the previous month. It was lowest level since April 2009, and the second-lowest on records dating back more than a half-century.

The building pace is far below the 1.2 million units a year that economists consider to be healthy.

Millions of foreclosures have forced home prices down and more are expected this year. Tight credit has made mortgage loans tough to come by. And some potential buyers who could qualify for loans are hesitant to enter the market, worried that prices will fall further.


  • Not good
    This is not a good thing, as it reflects a poor economy. How can lower prices be good for current homeowners?
  • Good
    I, for one, feel no sympathy for the builders. Irresponsible mass-tract building has harmed our region by promoting sprawl rather than reinvestment in our inner city. Perhaps if the housing supply remains limited, individuals might begin to move back into the inner-ring suburbs and downtown proper.
  • swing
    The pendulum always swings back the other way. What will demand look like and where will home-buyers choose to live? How much will they spend? Anybody's guess...
  • Shortage in coming years?
    I read an analsis by a well respected economist yesterday that stated that building developement is so slow in the region, particularly the lack of any planned new developments, that there will be a possibilty of a shortage of lots in 3-4 years in this region.

    Point was that builders are not developing any new communities, but rather snatching up vacant lots in established communtities and doing all buildling there. And since it taks at least 2 years to go from planning to building a new development, a shortage is on the horizon.

    Might be the only thing that helps the price of established homes.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.