Gordon enlists local track designer

January 8, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
gordonLocally based race track designer Paxton Waters’ engine is burning white hot despite the freezing temperatures outside. While the race season is dormant, Waters’ business is pedal to the metal. “It doesn’t matter what time of year it is,” Waters said. “I’m usually busy year-round.”

Waters flies to Ontario, Canada today to begin work on a project there with a group including NASCAR driver Jeff Gordon. The project, just a few miles from Buffalo, includes a one-mile oval and 2.5-mile road course. “The track alone is a $110 million project,” Waters said. “With retail and commercial elements, it’s a $250 million project.”

While Waters may be relatively unknown to most auto racing fans, he’s a well known and highly appreciated commodity among track builders and operators worldwide. Projects’ on Waters’ resumé include the Las Vegas Motor Speedway, California Speedway, Iowa Speedway and Pikes Peak International Raceway.

So when Gordon got involved in the Ontario project, the two quickly came together with other project principals. “Jeff is to this project what Rusty Wallace is to the track in Iowa,” Waters said. The Ontario project, Waters added, is on track to be done in early 2011.

The Ontario track could bring the highest levels of open-wheel and stock car racing to another Canadian destination. “The entire project is set on 650 acres,” Waters said. “This will be a major oval and road course speedway.”

The Ontario track is not Waters’ only project. He’s working on a big-time track in Angola, Africa; and just finished a project in Brazil. Waters also recently began working on a major project that is sure to turn heads in central Indiana. For more on that, check out this Saturday’s Indianapolis Business Journal. To learn more about Waters’ work, check out paxtonwatersarchitecture.com.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I could be wrong, but I don't think Butler views the new dorm as mere replacements for Schwitzer and or Ross.

  2. An increase of only 5% is awesome compared to what most consumers face or used to face before passage of the ACA. Imagine if the Medicaid program had been expanded to the 400k Hoosiers that would be eligible, the savings would have been substantial to the state and other policy holders. The GOP predictions of plan death spirals, astronomical premium hikes and shortages of care are all bunk. Hopefully voters are paying attention. The Affordable Care Act (a.k.a Obamacare), where fully implemented, has dramatically reduced the number of uninsured and helped contained the growth in healthcare costs.

  3. So much for competition lowering costs.

  4. As I understand the proposal, Keystone would take on the debt, not the city/CRC. So the $104K would not be used to service the $3.8M bond. Keystone would do that with its share.

  5. Adam C, if anything in Carmel is "packed in like sardines", you'll have to show me where you shop for groceries. Based on 2014 population estimates, Carmel has around 85,000 people spread across about 48 square miles, which puts its density at well below 1800 persons/sq mi, which is well below Indianapolis (already a very low-density city). Noblesville is minimally less dense than Carmel as well. The initiatives over the last few years have taken what was previously a provincial crossroads with no real identity beyond lack of poverty (and the predictably above-average school system) and turned it into a place with a discernible look, feel, and a center. Seriously, if you think Carmel is crowded, couldn't you opt to live in the remaining 95% of Indiana that still has an ultra-low density development pattern? Moreover, if you see Carmel as "over-saturated" have you ever been to Chicago--or just about any city outside of Indiana?