New 'Spider-man' not so amazing

July 3, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Haven't ranted about many movies lately mostly because I haven't been to many.

But I did catch "The Amazing Spider-Man, a film so overpacked with coincidences and writer-rigged plotting that I didn't believe a second of it and was bugged by most of it.

The fact that Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone are very good actors make the film they are stuck in even more annoying.

Trust me, I have no trouble buying a web-shooting super hero. I didn't worship or mind the one made 10 years ago. And I'm not objecting to unnecessary remakes because little that Hollywood does is necessary. (Keep in mind that Frederic March won an Oscar for "Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde" only about a decade after John Barrymore made his film version--and about a decade before Spencer Tracy had at the role.)

What I have trouble with is "oh come on" moments at nearly every plot turn.

I have trouble buying a high school student getting a positions of great responsibility in a high-tech, experiment-heavy company.

I have trouble with the fact that said company barely has a security system or even video cameras monitoring its experiments.

I have trouble that, right in the middle of a work space, there's loud science-for-beginners displays for the benefit of tour groups.

I have trouble believing a high school kid can have the crap beat out of him in front of an entire student body without anyone saying anything or his family pressing charges at the same school where a student gets his parents (well, uncle) called because he slam dunked a ball and broke a backboard.

I have trouble with a student body not awed by a guy who suddenly leaps fourteen feet in the air for the aforementioned dunk.

I have trouble with a giant lizard attack witnessed by hundreds of people being reported as a rumor.

I have trouble with fire-escape access New York City windows without locks.

I have trouble with time bombs that not only have conveniently visible numeric displays but also a helpful voice to tell you how close to your doom you are.

And I'm tired of writers relying on Emma Stone's hesitant charms to carry scenes.

"The Amazing Spider-Man" is like radio commentators who are just concerned with the impact of what they are saying right now, regardless of whether it makes any sense or connects to what happened moments ago or what happens next.

All of which wouldn't be so much of a problem if "The Amazing Spider-Man" was fun and/or original. 

Now where's Batman?

Your thoughts? 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Another mindless film
    These super hero films appear to be aimed at a young and naive audience, so plot holes aren't a concern. It would be nice if Hollywood spent a few million less on special efx and a few hundred thousand more on writers who can can come up with interesting movie plots, but it appears efx sell a lot of tickets.
    • Go see other movies!
      If you haven't seen "The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel" or "Moonrise Kingdom" go before they're gone. "Moonrise Kingdom" is extremely quirky which might bother some, but "The Best Exotic..." is just a wonderful cast of well seasoned British actors having a ball in a strange exotic place.
    • Supervising Art Director's Sexual Battery Case
      This film's supervising art director accused of sexual assault, libel and malcious prosecution of his trangender LA Music Award winning singer victim: http://news.yahoo.com/critical-motions-amazing-spider-man-supervising-art-director-070624725.html
    • Different set of problems
      I guess I'm not a movie critic because I can usually look past these kinds of plot holes. I liked the casting choices in this film better than the Toby Maguire version, but I found the film to be slow. The "original" film version was more exciting because Spidey fans had been waiting. Now we have something to compare it to, and it's better in some ways and worse in others. I liked it better than Lou, but it didn't knock my socks off.
    • Well...
      ... I think you are being WAYYY too critical. It is, afterall, a super-hero movie, not Kramer vs. Kramer. I enjoyed the movie for exactly what it was.
    • Spider Kramer
      Whether it's Spidey or Kramer, it's still up to the filmmakers to create a buy-able world. A few such problems are excusable for me. When they stack up this high, it blocks the entertainment...and I didn't even mention the cranes. And, as I said, they wouldn't have been as much of a problem for me if the film was more fun and/or original. --Lou
    • MacGuffin
      I liked the movie and didn't mind the plot holes, but in the end I was bothered by how the totally manufactured climax mirrored the equally engineered ending of "The Avengers." In both movies, the heroes have to find a way to disable some doom-bringing device on top of a New York skyscraper. They're just hollow excuses to stage a big fight, and gin up big consequences that have little to do with character development.
    • comic movies
      i liked this movie. my son liked it better than the older spider man. Sally Feild and Martin Sheen are much better actors. I love Martin Sheen. I like what he stands for. Was watching him on PBS the show was Empowering Minds he was great. I hope they come out with another spiderman soon.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

    2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

    3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

    4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

    5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

    ADVERTISEMENT