Review: Dance Kaleidoscope's 'Magical Mystery Tour'

October 17, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

GreenleeThe Beatles first charted with “Love Me Do” fifty years ago, which places some original fans in their 70s. With young audiences still falling for Fab Four music, that makes them perhaps the single band with the widest generational mass appeal.

No surprise, then, that Dance Kaleidoscope revived its 2007 “Magical Mystery Tour” in 2009 and again this season (Oct. 11-14)—and probably will bring it back in 2015, 2018, and 2022.

I worry, in tough economic times, that revivals will be more common. And even when new programs are created, that the commercial needs could stifle the company into being the dance equivalent of Broadways’ jukebox musicals (the next two shows being fueled by the music of Frank Sinatra and Edith Piaf).

TimothyBut why complain when the show keeps getting better? In 2009, the leads came across as showboating, throwing the balance off in both the “Innocence” first act and “Decadence” second. Not the case this time with Timothy June in the spotlight, providing a “Pippin”-like character to follow while never upstaging the ensemble.

He wasn’t alone in grasping his place in the big picture. With the current company, there’s more of a sense of welcoming the audience into the experience and a greater sense of the dancers being in the moment. And that’s all to the good.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • too late to matter
    Was intrigued enough by the review title to read your article, but then see the show ended on 10/14, though your review is being posted on the 17th. While interesting in overview, too late to support my attending the show.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT