Review: Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra's unofficial season opener

October 18, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

After weeks of contract negotiations and a lockout, the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra unofficially opened its 2012-13 season Thursday with hot chocolate and White Castle hamburgers in the lobby, a Happy Hour crowd that gave the players an extended standing ovation before a single note was played, and a program that didn’t just range from M83 to Beethoven but neatly combined both into the musical highlight of the evening.

OK, the samples from Pizzology were also pretty good.

A semi-bearded Zach De Pue and his Time for Three cohorts were the focus of most of the program, mixing in a Coldplay variation, a “Riverdance” tune, Led Zeppelin’s “Gallows Pole" (also mashed with Beethoven) and original musical by their occasional (but not tonight) keyboardist. The playing by the trio-in-residence was aggressive and spirited if not always mixing well with the rest of the ISO. The fact that the program was pulled together with three days mitigated any rough spots.

For a closer, Time for Three wisely turned the stage back over to the rank-and-file ISO for a conductorless “Bolero.” Ravel's hypnotic piece incessantly repeats its melody, layering it each time with different instruments until it seems like there couldn't possibly be another sound coming from the orchestra. That's when it all comes together with the entire orchestra engaged in the crazy sway whose impact is akin to being in the midst of a holographic Fellini film while buzzed.

And then its over...at least, the live part is. Ravel's melody, though, is likely to stick with you for days. You can hear it for yourself at the Oct. 19-20 concerts where it's paired with Debussy's "La Mer."  

Although they didn’t take the stage, both music director Krzystof Urbanski and principal pops conductor Jack Everly were in the house to witness the love-fest between the crowd and the musicians. Absence certainly seems to have made the Indianapolis hearts grow fonder.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Symphony with Light Show
    I completely enjoyed myself at Happy Hour at the Symphony on Thursday night. As Lou Harry alludes to above, you didn't even have to drink any alcohol to feel a buzz. What I especially liked is that in addition to entertaining my sense of taste, with the food (no, I wasn't eating instruments), and my sense of hearing, with the nicely nuanced mixtures of modern and classical tunes, my sense of sight got a treat as well. I thought the use of the stage lights throughout the evening really added that extra effect that kept me engaged with the performers throughout the show. The layering of lights as the instrumentation layered on top of itself during the ISOs playing of Bolero was especially effective. It was also fun to watch the tf3 cohorts grinning, shoulder shrugging, and moving their heads just as much as their bows while standing in front of the biggest, and might I say best, back-up band around.
  • Bittersweet
    Truly bittersweet. It was so great having our symphony back on stage (though I went to both fundraising concerts that the ISO musicians produced during the lockout) but I couldn't help thinking while sitting there all night about how skrewed over they were and how much they had to concede to take the stage simply because they, their endowment fund, their marketing and their fundraising have been so, so horribly mismanaged. It's like the kids being punished because their parents are such...well, bad stewards of the family. So it was bittersweet. Our musicians deserve more than this. I can tell you too, if board chair John Thornburgh or interim CEO Jackie Groth had dared to take the stage with our musicians, I was prepared to boo. And heckle loudly. I hope in the aftermath, there is a board and management shakeup and the musicians, in the end, get their due. If not, we're going to lose a lot of them to orchestras - and cities - that are more worthy of their dedication and talents.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT