Thoughts on the 2013 Oscar nominations

January 10, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

First, let me be clear that the Oscars don't matter a whole lot.

Except that they become a part of movie history. And they inspire some folks to get out and see some good movies. And they are one of the only television events that I look forward to every year.

Sure, the arts shouldn't be a horse race. But once a year, it's fun to meld culture and competition, especially when so many people have an experience with the form. Translation: It's very difficult to find people who care passionately about, say, the Tony Awards because so few people--at least here--have seen the work. And it's difficult to care about the Emmy Awards because a) there are so many categories and b) people gravitate toward the shows they like.

And so, with the 2013 Oscar nominations less than an hour old, here are some observations/opinions:

--It's a hoot that a Simpson's flick was nominated for Best Animated Short. But there it is: "Maggie Simpson in 'The Longest Daycare.'"

--Best Production Design could be the toughest category this year--although you may well be going to the rest room when it's aired. The nominees: "Anna Karenina," "The Hobbit," "Les Miserables," "Life of Pi," and "Lincoln." I'll go with "Anna Karenina" but I doubt if the Oscar will.

--The worst song in "Les Miserables" is the one written for the movie. Of course, "Suddenly" landed a nomination for Best Original Song.

--I don't think even sound editors know the difference between Best Sound Editing and Best Sound Mixing.

--"Moonrise Kingdom" gets only one nomination--for Best Original Screenplay. And that it was.

--The snubs pundits will be talking about the most will be Ben Affleck and Kathryn Bigalow not getting noms for the two military infiltration flicks "Argos" and "Zero Dark Thirty." (Congrats to those who won tickets to the Jan. 10 screening of the latter. Thanks for reading IBJ.)

--Much will be made of the Best Actress category having both the youngest and oldest nominations ever. And I'm sure someone in Hollywood is already planning a Lifetime Original Movie starring Emmanuelle Riva and Quvenzhané Wallis.

--Naomi Watts is very good in "The Impossible" and I wish I had pushed for her in the Indiana Film Journalists awards this year.

--Helen Hunt is the lead actress in "The Sessions," not supporting actress (as she is nominated). Ditto for Sally Field in "Lincoln."

--My favorite films of the year not to get any nominations: "The Perks of Being a Wallflower," "Starry, Starry Night," and "Safety Not Guaranteed."

What about your Oscar nomination observations?

--

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Incomplete
    I haven't seen Lincoln, but Bradley Cooper's acting in Silver Linings Playbook was pretty amazing I felt. I have a totally different view of his abilities as a result of this effort. And I think the movie itself is much more thoughtful and deeper than most critics or users reviews I have seen give it credit. I have seen a few reviews that call it a romantic comedy...I'm a knuckle-dragging, mouth breathing wrench-turner...and to me there was nothing 'romantic comedy' about it.
  • Mixed Bag
    The shows nominated this year each seem to be flawed to some degree. The attraction for me is who acted in them. Tommy Lee Jones made Lincoln for me. And Hugh Jackman carried Les Miserables (even if the purists did not like his singing. My favorite of the non-nominees was The Late Quartet with Christopher Walken. I wasn't bothered by the fact many classical musicians were offended by the movie.
  • Heartland Films
    Congratulations and a testament to Indianapolis's Heartland Film Festival, three Oscar nominated films were selected and shown during 2012's festival: Documentary Short "Inocente", Animated Short "Head over Heels", and Action Short "Buzkashi Boys".

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT