Thoughts on the 2013 Oscar nominations

January 10, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

First, let me be clear that the Oscars don't matter a whole lot.

Except that they become a part of movie history. And they inspire some folks to get out and see some good movies. And they are one of the only television events that I look forward to every year.

Sure, the arts shouldn't be a horse race. But once a year, it's fun to meld culture and competition, especially when so many people have an experience with the form. Translation: It's very difficult to find people who care passionately about, say, the Tony Awards because so few people--at least here--have seen the work. And it's difficult to care about the Emmy Awards because a) there are so many categories and b) people gravitate toward the shows they like.

And so, with the 2013 Oscar nominations less than an hour old, here are some observations/opinions:

--It's a hoot that a Simpson's flick was nominated for Best Animated Short. But there it is: "Maggie Simpson in 'The Longest Daycare.'"

--Best Production Design could be the toughest category this year--although you may well be going to the rest room when it's aired. The nominees: "Anna Karenina," "The Hobbit," "Les Miserables," "Life of Pi," and "Lincoln." I'll go with "Anna Karenina" but I doubt if the Oscar will.

--The worst song in "Les Miserables" is the one written for the movie. Of course, "Suddenly" landed a nomination for Best Original Song.

--I don't think even sound editors know the difference between Best Sound Editing and Best Sound Mixing.

--"Moonrise Kingdom" gets only one nomination--for Best Original Screenplay. And that it was.

--The snubs pundits will be talking about the most will be Ben Affleck and Kathryn Bigalow not getting noms for the two military infiltration flicks "Argos" and "Zero Dark Thirty." (Congrats to those who won tickets to the Jan. 10 screening of the latter. Thanks for reading IBJ.)

--Much will be made of the Best Actress category having both the youngest and oldest nominations ever. And I'm sure someone in Hollywood is already planning a Lifetime Original Movie starring Emmanuelle Riva and Quvenzhané Wallis.

--Naomi Watts is very good in "The Impossible" and I wish I had pushed for her in the Indiana Film Journalists awards this year.

--Helen Hunt is the lead actress in "The Sessions," not supporting actress (as she is nominated). Ditto for Sally Field in "Lincoln."

--My favorite films of the year not to get any nominations: "The Perks of Being a Wallflower," "Starry, Starry Night," and "Safety Not Guaranteed."

What about your Oscar nomination observations?

--

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Incomplete
    I haven't seen Lincoln, but Bradley Cooper's acting in Silver Linings Playbook was pretty amazing I felt. I have a totally different view of his abilities as a result of this effort. And I think the movie itself is much more thoughtful and deeper than most critics or users reviews I have seen give it credit. I have seen a few reviews that call it a romantic comedy...I'm a knuckle-dragging, mouth breathing wrench-turner...and to me there was nothing 'romantic comedy' about it.
  • Mixed Bag
    The shows nominated this year each seem to be flawed to some degree. The attraction for me is who acted in them. Tommy Lee Jones made Lincoln for me. And Hugh Jackman carried Les Miserables (even if the purists did not like his singing. My favorite of the non-nominees was The Late Quartet with Christopher Walken. I wasn't bothered by the fact many classical musicians were offended by the movie.
  • Heartland Films
    Congratulations and a testament to Indianapolis's Heartland Film Festival, three Oscar nominated films were selected and shown during 2012's festival: Documentary Short "Inocente", Animated Short "Head over Heels", and Action Short "Buzkashi Boys".

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT