REVIEW: ISO's "Hairspray" stands tall

January 11, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

First, an apology.

Based on previous in-concert productions of musicals offered by the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra, I fully expected to a) be thoroughly entertained, b) hear top-notch musical theater actors shine, and c) see actors carrying scripts for “Hairspray in Concert” (seen on Jan. 11 with additional shows through the 13th).

Turns out the first two parts aren’t an issue. In fact, two weeks into the new year, I already expect this wildly entertaining production to maintain a spot on my 2013 list of A&E favorites.

As to the scripts, well, that’s standard practice for these concert musicals. One of the conceits of the form here or at New York’s Encores, L.A.’s Reprise and elsewhere is that the minimal rehearsal time--usually just a week or two--is focused on the music. If that means carrying around a binder for an occasional line refresher during the show, so be it. That potential distraction didn’t get in the way of making the ISO’s “Guys and Dolls,” for instance, a landmark in my Indy A&E experiences.

With “Hairspray,” though, the cast works completely off book. And choreographer Jennifer Ladner doesn’t let them off easy as dancers, either, offering full production numbers throughout.

So for perhaps misrepresenting the show in my previews, I apologize.  

You still don’t get much in the way of sets. But I’ll trade sets almost any day for a full orchestra the size and strength of the ISO. A quick count at the Internet Broadway Database indicates that there were only 15 musicians in the pit for the original New York production of “Hairspray”—that’s a garage band compared to the ISO. And good luck trying to find a synthesizer here. The Marc Shaiman/Scott Wittman gem of a score for “Hairspray”—one of the brightest and catchiest in years—has been recorchestrated for the symphony, sounding as innocent, brassy, and confident as the show’s lead character.

I’ve seen “Hairspray” work even with a less-than-ideal Tracy at its core. It's that good of a show. But here, it has a near-ideal one. Marissa Perry, a vet of the Broadway production, never forgets the energy, warmth and spirit at the core of her character. She needs to be a person whose feet can’t help but move to the beat, whether anyone else can hear it or not. As vibrant and alive when she’s dancing in the background as she is belting out a solo tune, Perry is a smile throughout, giving no reason to doubt that hearththrob Link is nuts about her.

The supporting cast and dancers all have opportunities to shine. Paul Vogt, as Edna, knows how to get laughs from just picking up the phone—and seems to fully understand that this big mamma’s developing acceptance of herself is one of the show’s charms. NaTasha Yvette Williams has both the vocal chops and the gravitas to deliver the powerful “I Know Where I’ve Been.” Nick Adams (so much fun on Broadway in “Priscilla, Queen of the Desert”) makes for a likable Link who knows how to move. And Beth Leavel turns what the one-note evil TV producer Velma von Tussle and her “(The Legend of) Miss Baltimore Crabs” number into a show highlight. As Tracy's father, Micky Dolenz is, well, Micky Dolenz. And that’s just fine.

I was a little concerned going in about John Waters serving as narrator for the show. But Waters, the writer/director of the original film, is used judiciously. His insight into the real-life people and places that inspired this Baltimore fantasy—and his acknowledgment of the harsher reality truer to the era between Elvis and the Beatles—give the production an added perspective without diminishing its pleasures.

I’d write more but I’m on my way back to see it again tonight. Yes, it’s that much fun.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Bravo!
    The show earned its standing ovation Friday night. I left wishing I hadn't already booked the rest of my weekend so I could watch it again.
  • Baltimore
    I am so happy to read such a positive review! I have tickets for later this month in Baltimore, and, after reading your experience, am more excited than ever to make the trip. I look forward to enjoying the show as much as you did!
  • ISO & Hairspray
    It was a superb performance! I saw Hairspray on Broadway during its first couple months and this production certainly compared favorably to the original! Loved the depth of the orchestra, the dancing, the acting, and the singing. Such wonderful singers with a great orchestra accompanying!
  • Outstanding!
    Bravo to all those who made Hairspray such fantastic fun! The music, the voices, the dancing, the costumes--they were all outstanding! The ISO outdid itself!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT