Review: Bloomington Playwrights Project's 'The Truman Show' musical

February 9, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

I love the fact that Bloomington Playwrights Project has gotten into the brutally difficult business of incubating new musicals.

Crafting such a show isn't just about writing a good tunestack to go with solid source material. As with a child, a musical has to find its voice--not the voice of its individual creators but a voice of its own. And that voice doesn't always come with its birth, but can transform as it finds its feet.

I missed "Kissing Frogs," the musical crafted by IU alumni Schonfeld and Nicole Parker (she of "Mad TV" note) that took early steps at BPP in 2011. So I didn't want to miss Alex Gemignani and Brad Bauner's "The Truman Show," the latest BPP-produced new musical (Feb. 1-10). 

Famliarity with the material seems to be assumed: Even the show's poster isn't worried about spoiler prevention. As those who have seen the film know, Truman is a man raised from birth in an elaborate, live reality show. The rub is that he isn't aware of it, naively buying into his world as the real thing. But cracks begin to show, not everyone in his universe buys into the morality of this manipulation, and Truman begins to believe that his life isn't as real as he once thought. 

The movie requires an enormous suspension of disbelief (even these days with TV shows getting closer and closer to this kind of audience indulgence). The musical needs even more--and not just because, in this production, the roles, regardless of age, are played by college students).

Yes, we accept characters stepping out of reality in conventional musicals to belt out a telling tune and perform choreographed dance routines. But the musical numbers we see on stage aren't really a part of Truman's reality or the reality of the unreal real characters in his life. They are musical conventions and they muddy the lines in a story that, at its core, is anchored in the subtle differences between one reality and another. 

One strong sign of hope for the material lies in in a second act song where the manipulative show producer sings instructions to the earpiece of one of Truman's "friends" and that character sings them to Truman. It's a unique duet that gives the show musical layers that don't exist elsewhere, despite the earnestness of the production.

As it stands, though, the big leap--the kind that led the "Wicked" and "Les Miserables" creative team to throw out most of their source material--hasn't been made. As represented here, the show stands, wobbly, in the camp with "The Wedding Singer" and "9 to 5"--adaptations that aren't quite sure, theatrically, why they've been adapted to this form. 

Driving back to Indy, I couldn't help but wonder what would happen if Truman's "show" actually did feature choreographed dances, if his fake-life frinds did sing balads, and if his neighbords greeted him musically every morning. What would happen if that was the reality this guy grew up with, believing from a young age that people sing and dance their feelings. Wouldn't is reality include trying to find his own musical voice in order to fit in?

Now that might be a musical. 

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT