Critics conference journal #2: Content and context discussed by out-of-towners

March 22, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Over late dinner, the discussions were lively at every table at Ralston's Drafthouse.

That's where those in town for the American Theatre Critics Association conference gathered for a post-show meal after attending their first Indianapolis play, "The Lyons" at the Phoenix Theatre.

These folks don't just talk about the content of plays, they talk about the context. How does it differ seeing a show early in the run (when critics are usually invited) rather than late in the run (as we did this time)? How do we approach performances differently when we've seen the actors in many other roles (as, in this case, I have but they haven't)? How much should the size and shape of a theater space affect the tone of a performance ("The Lyons" is in the downstairs Basile Theatre)?

There was also talk beyond theater with those who arrived in Indy early, making the others jealous as they shared their experiences at The Children's Museum of Indianapolis, the Indianapolis Museum of Art, the Indiana War Memorial and elsewhere. 

There may be some misconceptions, too. After spending time at the conference hotel, the Alexander, and experiencing a welcoming reception at the Conrad Indianapolis, they might be under the mistaken belief that every hotel in Indy is packed with impressive original art.

Today, we spend quality time at the Indiana History Society for tours and panels (the public is invited to a "Why the Midwest?" panel at 1 p.m.), then it's off to the Vonnegut Library, the Indiana Repertory Theatre (for a sample of Dance Kaleidoscope's "Piaf Plus" and a full performance of "The Whpping Man") and the Cabaret at the Columbia Club.

Follow tweets at #indyatca13.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT