Critics conference journal #2: Content and context discussed by out-of-towners

March 22, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Over late dinner, the discussions were lively at every table at Ralston's Drafthouse.

That's where those in town for the American Theatre Critics Association conference gathered for a post-show meal after attending their first Indianapolis play, "The Lyons" at the Phoenix Theatre.

These folks don't just talk about the content of plays, they talk about the context. How does it differ seeing a show early in the run (when critics are usually invited) rather than late in the run (as we did this time)? How do we approach performances differently when we've seen the actors in many other roles (as, in this case, I have but they haven't)? How much should the size and shape of a theater space affect the tone of a performance ("The Lyons" is in the downstairs Basile Theatre)?

There was also talk beyond theater with those who arrived in Indy early, making the others jealous as they shared their experiences at The Children's Museum of Indianapolis, the Indianapolis Museum of Art, the Indiana War Memorial and elsewhere. 

There may be some misconceptions, too. After spending time at the conference hotel, the Alexander, and experiencing a welcoming reception at the Conrad Indianapolis, they might be under the mistaken belief that every hotel in Indy is packed with impressive original art.

Today, we spend quality time at the Indiana History Society for tours and panels (the public is invited to a "Why the Midwest?" panel at 1 p.m.), then it's off to the Vonnegut Library, the Indiana Repertory Theatre (for a sample of Dance Kaleidoscope's "Piaf Plus" and a full performance of "The Whpping Man") and the Cabaret at the Columbia Club.

Follow tweets at #indyatca13.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT