Thoughts on Civic's 'Into the Woods'

May 8, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Into the Woods

Stephen Sondheim musicals seem everywhere in central Indiana these days, with the rarely staged "Follies" up at Footlite Musicals, "Sunday in the Park with George" offered last month at IU, "A Little Night Music" gracing the IRT earlier this season, and "West Side Story" (lyrics by Sondheim) coming to town as part of the Broadway series. If only Indianapolis Opera would take a swing at "Sweeney Todd" ...

At the Center for the Performing Arts, Booth Tarkington Civic Theatre's production of the Sondheim/James Lapine fairy-tale mash-up "Into the Woods" runs through May 11, and what's surprising about that production isn't any boldness in casting or design (although the lighting by Ryan Koharchik is first class). Civic isn’t known for unconventional stagings, and “Into the Woods” is played pretty much by the book.

Rather, the surprise comes in the palpable, not-watered-down sense of doom that hangs over that second act. Having seen multiple productions of the musical, including the Broadway original, you’d think I’d be immune to its tensions. But the Civic folks manage to make that potentially troublesome second act appropriately troubling. The Baker sings of “wondering what even worse is still in store” and, in the audience, I felt that fear.

Most cast members offer variations on the readily available recording of the Broadway production. Standing out, though, are Nathalie Cruz—particularly in the first half when her haggard witch carries a desperation scarier than her spells—and Julie Bonnett, giving a rich truthfulness to Cinderella that I haven’t seen in any of the previous productions I’ve watched.

More thoughts on Civic's "Into the Woods" in the May 13 IBJ and online at ibj.com/arts on May 11.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. "This was a very localized, Indiana issue," he said. As in, Indiana failed to expand Medicaid to cover its poor citizens resulting in the loss of essential medical services, including this EMS company. Well done, Indiana GOP. Here are the real death panels: GOP state governments who refuse to expand Medicaid for political reasons.

  2. In the "one for all, all for none" socialist doctrine the sick die...this plus obama"care" equates to caucasian genocide plus pushed flight to cities thus further eroding the conservative base and the continualed spiral toward complete liberal/progressive/marxist America.

  3. There is a simple reason why WISH is not reporting on this story. LIN has others stations in different markets that are affiliated with CBS. Reporting about CBS blindsiding WISH/LIN due to CBS's greed and bullying tatics would risk any future negoations LIN will have with CBS in other markets.

  4. My best always! Dave Wilson

  5. How did Columbus, Ohio pull off a car share service without a single dollar of public subsidies? They must not have a mayor who is on the take like Indianapolis. Daimler Benz offers Columbus residents their Smart Cars on a market-driven basis: "This has some neat features. Cars don’t have to be picked up and dropped off at fixed points. You find one with your smart phone based on GPS, and drop it off anywhere in the service area you can find a spot – even at a meter. These cars aren’t required to feed the meter so you get free on street parking while using them. I was told this system was put in place on a market basis without subsidies – and that the vendor actually pays the city for the use of the meters." http://www.urbanophile.com/2014/05/26/checking-in-on-columbus/

ADVERTISEMENT