Mellencamp's musical to launch tour from IU

May 10, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For 13 years, John Mellencamp and Stephen King have been developing their musical collaboration, "Ghost Brothers of Darkland County." Now, after a not-particularly-well-received 2012 production in Atlanta, the show is being re-created for the road.

A 20-city tour will launch with a one-night showing on Oct. 10 at the IU Auditorium. The cast, including 15 actors and a four-piece live band, also will be rehearsing there prior to opening. After a southern swing through Kentucky, Tennessee and North Carolina, it will return to Indiana to play one-nighters in Evansville (Oct. 17 at Aiken Theatre at The Centre) and at Clowes Hall in Indianapolis (Oct. 18). Later stops are planned for Fort Wayne and South Bend. Click here for more details.

The rest of Clowes Hall's season will be announced May 16.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Hee Haw
    This is hilarious. It flopped in Atlanta, but Cougar has 13 years tied up in it so he's gonna play Evansville, Bloomington and Fort Wayne. Priceless. Greater minds would simply cut their losses.
    • I'm hopeful
      This is par for the course for the development of a musical. It's workshopped, re-written, re-scored, and re-staged extensively. If the producers involved are still willing to mount a production after a regional flop, that is because there is still merit in the production (see Andrew Lloyd Webber's "Whistle Down the Wind" which, in the late 90s, had several workshopped productions, opened in Washington DC for out-of-town previews, and closed a few weeks before its Broadway production was to begin). King and Mellencamp are both compelling writers; if there was not merit in another production no one would be investing in it. Don't be so quick to write it off.
    • Ghosts bros.
      Have to side with Angi on this one. While we won't know the merits of Ghost Brothers 2.0 until it's on stage, musical theater history has plenty of examples of shows that righted themselves after difficult early productions. I'd put Children of Eden, Aida, and Merrily We Roll Along among them. --Lou

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

    2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

    3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

    4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

    5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

    ADVERTISEMENT