Ai Weiwei on the NSA: Shocking if American citizens allow this to continue

June 12, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It's not surprising that Ai Weiwei, whose outspoken career is illustrated in a show at the Indianapolis Museum of Art, has something to say about the NSA surveillance controversy currently swirling in the United States.

In an essay published June 11 in The Guardian, Ai Weiwei, who lived in the U.S. for 12 years, said, "To me, it's abusively using government powers to interfere with individual's privacy. ... It will be shocking for me if American citizens allow this to continue."

He makes clear that different legal conditions exist in the U.S. and China but notes, "There is no guarantee that China, the U.S., or any other government will not use the information falsely or wrongly. I think especially that a nation like the U.S., which is technically advanced, should not take advantage of its power. It encourages other nations."

For the entire essay, click here.

Check out my review of the "Ai Weiwei: According to What?" exhibit at the IMA here. It runs through July 21 at the IMA.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Nobama the Hypocrite
    I remebmer back in the day after 9/11, a certain president decided to record OVERSEAS calls to make an attempt to spoil terrorist attacks, and that president was once again, called everything but a president. Dumbocrats were outraged thinking their calls discussing gay marriage, abortion, gun control, etc was being recorded. However, our current administration, has been recording our conversations abroad, locally, and on line, and is defending itselves in the name of national security. How many dumbocrats are going to go along with this program now that Nobama is doing it that crapped themselves when that other president wanted to record OVERSEAS calls??? Can you say dumbocrat or, I mean, hypocrites!!!!!
    • Say It Ain't So Joe...
      Well, Obama is wrong to allow this. He needs to work on the economy. Bush and Cheney were the architects of this (NSA spying), Obama has wrongfully continued doing it. Bush, Cheney and Obama are wrong. Obama, now in power, needs to stop this (NSA) spying on citizens.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT