Ballet benefit adds dancers from Norway, England and more

June 13, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

If the Indianapolis City Ballet hadn't staged world-class (and I'm deliberately and truthfully using that term) programs each of the last four years for its Evening with the Stars benefit shows, I'd be skeptical about the use of the "artists subject to change" notation in its announcement of this September's lineup.

 

But many of the world's top ballet dancers have come to town for each of those stunning shows and there's no reason to think this year will be any different.

Among the companies represented this time around: American Ballet Theatre (Gillian Murphy and Cory Stearns), San Francisco Ballet (Yuan Yuan Tan and Damian Smith), Berlin Ballet (Elisa Carrillo Cabrera and Mikhail Kaniskin) and, a favorite from the past, Stuttgart Ballet (Alicia Amatriain and Jason Reilly).

New to the Murat stage Sept. 7 will be dancers from Norwegian National Ballet and England National Ballet as well as Demitra Bereveskos, an Indy prodigy now studying in New York.

We may not have a full-time, world-class professional ballet troupe (yet). But, once a year, we have one of the best ballet evenings on the planet. Anyone with any interest in dance should be looking forward to this one, too.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Thanks!
    Thanks Lou for the column about our September 7 Evening with the Stars event. The "subject to change" line is something that we always use - as you can imagine injuries in dance are unpredictable and dancers coming to Indy want to be at their best for our enthusiastic crowd. We haven't had to change the line-up yet in four years but know that if it ever happens, we'll do our best to find a stellar replacement. Thanks again for the kind words!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT