Summer Celebration exhibits open at convention center

July 19, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After awards were bestowed on Spike Lee, Billy Dee Williams, The O’Jays and others at the Pacers Sports & Entertainment Corporate Luncheon Friday afternoon, Indiana Black Expo president & CEO Tanya Bell encouraged the thousands of attendees to stop by the exhibit halls.

I had naively assumed that a trek through the Indiana Convention Center’s exhibitions was a given. But Bell’s need to plead underlined something that’s easy to forget about such large-scale events: They can be completely different experiences to different people.

For some, Summer Celebration is the corporate luncheon, an empowering gathering that also allows for some celebrity spotting. For others, it means the concerts, free (The O’Jays on American Legion Mall) or paid (Jill Scott at Bankers Life Fieldhouse). Some go for the boxing. Others for the free health screenings. Still others to shop (Macy’s is on board for the first time this year, although there are dozens of other retail booths to browse and buy.)

My afternoon visit included viewing a display of Indiana State Museum photographs titled “To Stir the Conscience: The Civil Rights Movement in Indiana.” From there I segued to artwork from Herron graduates, including some beautiful work from Colette Ross-Boggan, who re-imagines family photographs via collage. Family matters play a key role, too, in Kendra Washington’s “Trayvon: Reflected in my Child,” also a collage, which imposes cut out headlines—and a gun—onto an already strong image of her baby.

Also among the cultural exhibitions: a sample of the Fort Wayne Museum of Art’s current show “Afros: A Celebration of Natural Hair,” featuring photographs by Michael July.

For a complete schedule of IBE Summer Celebration activities and events, click here.

Your thoughts?


Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.