You-review-it Monday: Feinstein competition and more

July 28, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Yes, I missed the recreation of the "Last Waltz" concert at the Vogue. And Karen Irwin's Janis Joplin show at the Cabaret at the Club. 

But I have excuses. I was in Muncie speaking at the Midwest Writers Workshop, a wonderful gathering of scribes across the experience spectrum learning with each other, sharing stories, and offering fellowship. After classes, I had just enough time to get to the Palladium to see the finals of the Great American Songbook high school vocal competition, grab a few hours sleep, and then host another wonderful IBJ A&E Road Trip on Saturday to Chicago to see the Goodman Theatre's production of "The Jungle Book" (which I wrote about here). 

So did you get to any of the aforementioned shows? Or did you catch the final weekend for "ZIrkusGrimm" or the Indianapolis International Film Festival.

What did you hear, see or do on the A&E front last weekend? 

Your thoughts?

  • Indy film fest
    I saw Tales From the Organ Trade at the Indy Film Fest on Friday night. It was a very well done documentary that really made you think; what would I do if I needed a kidney (or other organ) and the US donor list was looking like a bad option? Or, would I be willing to give up my kidney for a loved one? It was an interesting film and we had a very nice evening.
  • Great Show / Bad Show
    You didn't miss anything at the Karen Irwin show. It was labeled as a tribute to Janis Joplin, but she spent more time talking about herself, than she did singing. I'd call it brutal to sit through. SUCH A NIGHT, however, was one of the best concerts of the year. They really knocked it out of the park.
  • Great Show
    We went Sat. nite and from what I understand Friday was the rowdy singing and dancing audience.... The piece was a lovely tribute to a performer gone too so. I have listen to many Janis recording and if you couldn't see Karen you wouldn't have known it was live.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.