Are museums just 'graveyards for stuff'?

August 23, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

On this Start with Art Friday, I'm stopped by a story at CNN.com in which senior producer James Durston calls museums "tombs for inanimate things."

"They're like libraries," he writes, "without the party atmosphere" in a piece bluntly titled, "Why I Hate Museums."

Durston wants to know where the muse is in today's museums. He laments that the 200th glass case containing "an old bowl" wasn't interesting at Doha's Museum of Islamic Art. But perhaps that's because he looked at 200 instead of two. He says he wasn't titillated at the sex museum in Amsterdam. But there are other places to go if that's the outcome he wants. (And he should take plenty of singles.)

The piece brings up an essential truth: Some—perhaps many—people who go to museums are bored. But he puts the entire burden on the museums to become interesting. To become theater. And that's where Durston misses something essential.

Curators do make efforts to bring their collections and temporary exhibitions to life. But most museums, rightly, are contemplative places. When they focus primarily on entertaining, they tend to embarrass themselves and trivialize their treasures.

I do agree with him on one thing, though: The gift shop tacked onto the end of a special exhibition often acts as an esthetic cold shower. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT