Review: 'Flashdance: The Musical' at Clowes Hall

October 2, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Back in the days when records were the music delivery system of choice, every 45 rpm disc had a b-side. There, taking up space, was a song nobody expected to be a hit. It filled up space and, one hoped, brought some pleasure to those who somehow stumbled onto it with low expectations.

“Flashdance: The Musical” (at Clowes Hall through Oct. 6), is the theatrical equivalent of the b-side. Anyone buying a ticket expecting a great evening of musical theater has been sitting in bright lights and being doused with water for too long. Go in with minimal expectations, though, and there are pleasures to be had.

The source material for “Flashdance” comes from a musical-ish movie. That is, a movie where the music soundtrack played a key role (perhaps the key role) but whose characters never actually sang any songs. Think "Footloose" and "Dirty Dancing." They capture the fancy of theater producers who figure there's a market for stage versions. With rare exceptions, though, the main characters in stage musicals actually belt out notes, so the stories have to be adapted so that the existing hit songs canbe sung. And since the running time of most albums is shorter than the needs of a stage musical, original songs have to be added.

In "Flashdance," the new tunes don’t represent much of a qualitative drop-off from the show’s ‘80s hits (“Maniac,” “Gloria,” “What a Feeling,” etc.). The scenic design—set pieces combined with projections and dramatic lighting—effectively keep the action moving. The writers saddled with the adaptation assignment wisely opted for sincerity over kitsch. And the dancing is energetic if not inspired.

My memory of the screen “Flashdance” is mercifully muddied by 30 years of not seeing it. So I didn’t arrive at Clowes with any need for scene-by-scene comparison. But even I could see that the show's most awkward moments were the ones where it tried to recreate iconic moments from the movie. On it's own, most of it is b-side time filler (which still puts it head-and-bare-shoulder above "Happy Days: The Musical").   


Through it all, Jillian Mueller proves a game leading lady, triple-threating her way through a brutally demanding part, physically and vocally. Even in a formula show crafted by marketers rather than theater artists—a show that sometimes feels like “Billy Elliot” with a lobotomy—she’s an actress/singer/dancer to root for.

  • Flash in the pan
    I saw it on opening night. While I was impressed by the energy and the performance of the cast, I didn't think it was Broadway worthy. It was too long and the original songs were unmemorable.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....