Review: 'Flashdance: The Musical' at Clowes Hall

October 2, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Back in the days when records were the music delivery system of choice, every 45 rpm disc had a b-side. There, taking up space, was a song nobody expected to be a hit. It filled up space and, one hoped, brought some pleasure to those who somehow stumbled onto it with low expectations.

“Flashdance: The Musical” (at Clowes Hall through Oct. 6), is the theatrical equivalent of the b-side. Anyone buying a ticket expecting a great evening of musical theater has been sitting in bright lights and being doused with water for too long. Go in with minimal expectations, though, and there are pleasures to be had.

The source material for “Flashdance” comes from a musical-ish movie. That is, a movie where the music soundtrack played a key role (perhaps the key role) but whose characters never actually sang any songs. Think "Footloose" and "Dirty Dancing." They capture the fancy of theater producers who figure there's a market for stage versions. With rare exceptions, though, the main characters in stage musicals actually belt out notes, so the stories have to be adapted so that the existing hit songs canbe sung. And since the running time of most albums is shorter than the needs of a stage musical, original songs have to be added.

In "Flashdance," the new tunes don’t represent much of a qualitative drop-off from the show’s ‘80s hits (“Maniac,” “Gloria,” “What a Feeling,” etc.). The scenic design—set pieces combined with projections and dramatic lighting—effectively keep the action moving. The writers saddled with the adaptation assignment wisely opted for sincerity over kitsch. And the dancing is energetic if not inspired.

My memory of the screen “Flashdance” is mercifully muddied by 30 years of not seeing it. So I didn’t arrive at Clowes with any need for scene-by-scene comparison. But even I could see that the show's most awkward moments were the ones where it tried to recreate iconic moments from the movie. On it's own, most of it is b-side time filler (which still puts it head-and-bare-shoulder above "Happy Days: The Musical").   


Through it all, Jillian Mueller proves a game leading lady, triple-threating her way through a brutally demanding part, physically and vocally. Even in a formula show crafted by marketers rather than theater artists—a show that sometimes feels like “Billy Elliot” with a lobotomy—she’s an actress/singer/dancer to root for.

  • Flash in the pan
    I saw it on opening night. While I was impressed by the energy and the performance of the cast, I didn't think it was Broadway worthy. It was too long and the original songs were unmemorable.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!