Review: 'Flashdance: The Musical' at Clowes Hall

October 2, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Back in the days when records were the music delivery system of choice, every 45 rpm disc had a b-side. There, taking up space, was a song nobody expected to be a hit. It filled up space and, one hoped, brought some pleasure to those who somehow stumbled onto it with low expectations.

“Flashdance: The Musical” (at Clowes Hall through Oct. 6), is the theatrical equivalent of the b-side. Anyone buying a ticket expecting a great evening of musical theater has been sitting in bright lights and being doused with water for too long. Go in with minimal expectations, though, and there are pleasures to be had.

The source material for “Flashdance” comes from a musical-ish movie. That is, a movie where the music soundtrack played a key role (perhaps the key role) but whose characters never actually sang any songs. Think "Footloose" and "Dirty Dancing." They capture the fancy of theater producers who figure there's a market for stage versions. With rare exceptions, though, the main characters in stage musicals actually belt out notes, so the stories have to be adapted so that the existing hit songs canbe sung. And since the running time of most albums is shorter than the needs of a stage musical, original songs have to be added.

In "Flashdance," the new tunes don’t represent much of a qualitative drop-off from the show’s ‘80s hits (“Maniac,” “Gloria,” “What a Feeling,” etc.). The scenic design—set pieces combined with projections and dramatic lighting—effectively keep the action moving. The writers saddled with the adaptation assignment wisely opted for sincerity over kitsch. And the dancing is energetic if not inspired.

My memory of the screen “Flashdance” is mercifully muddied by 30 years of not seeing it. So I didn’t arrive at Clowes with any need for scene-by-scene comparison. But even I could see that the show's most awkward moments were the ones where it tried to recreate iconic moments from the movie. On it's own, most of it is b-side time filler (which still puts it head-and-bare-shoulder above "Happy Days: The Musical").   


Through it all, Jillian Mueller proves a game leading lady, triple-threating her way through a brutally demanding part, physically and vocally. Even in a formula show crafted by marketers rather than theater artists—a show that sometimes feels like “Billy Elliot” with a lobotomy—she’s an actress/singer/dancer to root for.

  • Flash in the pan
    I saw it on opening night. While I was impressed by the energy and the performance of the cast, I didn't think it was Broadway worthy. It was too long and the original songs were unmemorable.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.