You-review-it Monday: Matisse, Macheath and more

October 13, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For me, the weekend included trips to the Matisse show at the Indianapolis Museum of Art (more on that in my upcoming column), a trek to Bloomington for the John Mellencamp/Stephen King musical "Ghost Brothers of Darkland Country" (reviewed here), and being a witness to Indianapolis Opera's unfortunate production of "Threepenny Opera" (more on that later).

I also finished a pair of theatrical biographies ("Will in the World" and "Eugene O'Neill: Beyond Mourning and Tragedy") and found time to watch the disarming "Mud," a low-key, effective film with a rich sense of character and place and solid performances all around.

What about you?

Did you go to the movies for "Gravity"? Visit either the Headless Horeseman at Conner Prairie or the unscripted improv version at Comedy Sportz? Did you go Oranje at the fairgrounds or catch one of the final performances of the IRT's outstanding "Crucible"?

What did you do on the A&E front this weekend? 


  • The WONDERFUL Threepenny Opera
    I attended The Threepenny Opera on Saturday night and loved it. It was lively and entertaining. I found Caitlin Mathes performance to be especially exceptional.
  • Chocolate Fest
    I attended Arts for Learning's Chocolate Fest on Saturday afternoon at the Harrison Center for the Arts with my 6 year old daughter and had a blast! Chocolate tastings, art activities, food trucks, and an awesome up-close experience with Melissa Gallant's harp made the afternoon quite unique and special.
  • Threepenny Opera
    I saw Threepenny and thought it was great. Being written in the 20th century, in English, and with lots of dialogue, I thought it was an easily accessible and enjoyable show. I was also impressed with the set design and their use of the space at the Indianapolis Opera Center. Overall I thought it was a good production and I would recommend it to others.
    • A Caitlin Fan
      A librettist, I attended Portland, Oregon Opera Classes in which Caitlin sang our work and chatted with us. A few days later she did fifteen Kurt Weill songs, cabaret style, at Portland's Vie de Boheme. She is warm, personable, and incredibly talented. Please tell me more about her Threepenny performance. Ralph
    • did you leave out a word?
      We plan to see Three penny Opera this week. Did you leave out a word between "unfortuntely" and "production"?
      • not at 3 Penny
        Perhaps you were in the parking lot when the 3 Penny was performed...or did your ears miss the wonderful singers? Grand Opera is not always grand...too expensive to perform with regularity these days. Good show and perfect for the fall season of ghouls, ghosts and goblins. Jenny was thrilling.
      • correction
        Peggy, It's been corrected. Thank you. Barbara, Nope. I was there for all three hours Friday night. I'm glad you enjoyed it.
      • Threepenney Opera
        I thought it was an extremely well performed period piece that not only told a story of seedy Berlin but is an historical commentary of the times and a rebellion to grand opera. The voices were great and the intimacy of the small venue allowed it to work.
      • Chekhov
        Saw "Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike" at the Phoenix, and as usual for the Phoenix, it was an excellent production -- but what an awful play, even by Durang standards! Anyone expecting a clever satire on Chekhov will be subjected to references to Chekhov bluntly inserted into the play, and everyone will be subjected to a rambling Luddite rant inserted near the end of the show.
      • Agree on Threepenny Opera
        I'm with Lou on the Threepenny Opera. The musical performances were great but they couldn't save the production. Not one joke landed during the entire first act of the Friday night performance.

      Post a comment to this blog

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

      2. Shouldn't this be a museum

      3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

      4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

      5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.