Give a listen to Josh Kaufman's 'Voice'-winning voice

May 21, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

I couldn't say it better than IBJ's Eight@8, so I repeat here, with links. Also, while "The Voice" tour isn't (yet) scheduled for Indianapolis, it is set for Chicago July 16.

And sometimes life just gets it right.

A few months ago, Josh Kaufman was a 38-year-old SAT test tutor and family man who gigged around Indianapolis as a blue-eyed soul singer, including a lunchtime slot at the Circle's Potbelly. Today, he is the newly crowned winner of NBC's "The Voice," with a record contract and a new car (brought to you by Kia!). Critics agreed: Kaufman was the class of the Season 6 class.

If you can only watch one performance, here's his scorching cover of Adele's "Set Fire to the Rain" from the finals. (His "Signed, Sealed, Delivered I'm Yours" is solid as well.) The bespectacled and bookish Kaufman couldn't be more humble and modest. (Here's his exit interview.)

Is he the next Steve Winwood or this year's Taylor Hicks? Who cares? He's ours, and he's a winner.

  • Winner
    Just as long as he does not go country on us.
    • kaufman
      Well, if Kaufman doesn't mind making a few million a year and being one of the best live performers around then maybe he will be lucky enough to be the next Taylor Hicks. I doubt it because he doesn't have nearly as strong a voice or performing skills.
      • Josh
        A big Congratulations to Josh and his family. He is a true winner all the way. I never had any doubt that he would win!!!
      • Cody what?
        Ok...not gonna bash Taylor Hicks (well then again, maybe I will a little, but I don't dislike him...I'm not Simon), but Lou brought him up for a reason...of all of the winners of these mostly silly, over the top, "talent" contests, Mr. Hicks is easily the least talented. Doesn't mean he's devoid of talent...but if you seriously think that Mr. Hicks is a better singer than Mr. Kaufman, you need to get some hearing aids pronto, because you are in need of a auditory for performing skills, I will take Kaufman's unpretentious "let the song do the talking approach" any day...Hicks' histrionics as a performer are clearly meant to distract folks from the fact that his voice is pretty ordinary...he is the stuff of parody (Jason Sudekis' "Soul Patrol", Fallon, Julia Louis Dreyfus...Taylor's best attribute is his unfailing good humor, as he seems to be in on the jokes, and can laugh at himself)...he has a residence in Vegas for heavens sake, he's only been around for 8 years and he's already reached the end of the road, the music business is littered with people who were moderately talented at best who made a fortune, getting paid well in music doesn't necessarily equate with artistry and for Kaufman, he may not even fare as well as Hicks has career wise despite being obviously far more talented...the blue eyed soul thing is gonna have to make a larger comeback for him to score big...there are other singers as good or better (Allen Stone for one) already working that territory who are doing well but not getting rich, if that is the criteria we are going to use to judge the art...the original purveyors of that genre (white dudes with soul music and gospel influences), like Hall and Oates, Boz Scaggs, Michael McDonald, are still performing. The new music in that genre doesn't get a lot of airplay on the radio, or anywhere else...winning one of these contests doesn't necessarily guarantee success...I wish him luck and I hope he can ride his current notoriety to wherever he wants to go...I know several people who know him, and by all accounts he is a terrific person.

      Post a comment to this blog

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      1. Aaron is my fav!

      2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See to learn more.

      3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

      4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

      5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...