Give a listen to Josh Kaufman's 'Voice'-winning voice

May 21, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

I couldn't say it better than IBJ's Eight@8, so I repeat here, with links. Also, while "The Voice" tour isn't (yet) scheduled for Indianapolis, it is set for Chicago July 16.

And sometimes life just gets it right.

A few months ago, Josh Kaufman was a 38-year-old SAT test tutor and family man who gigged around Indianapolis as a blue-eyed soul singer, including a lunchtime slot at the Circle's Potbelly. Today, he is the newly crowned winner of NBC's "The Voice," with a record contract and a new car (brought to you by Kia!). Critics agreed: Kaufman was the class of the Season 6 class.

If you can only watch one performance, here's his scorching cover of Adele's "Set Fire to the Rain" from the finals. (His "Signed, Sealed, Delivered I'm Yours" is solid as well.) The bespectacled and bookish Kaufman couldn't be more humble and modest. (Here's his exit interview.)

Is he the next Steve Winwood or this year's Taylor Hicks? Who cares? He's ours, and he's a winner.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Winner
    Just as long as he does not go country on us.
    • kaufman
      Well, if Kaufman doesn't mind making a few million a year and being one of the best live performers around then maybe he will be lucky enough to be the next Taylor Hicks. I doubt it because he doesn't have nearly as strong a voice or performing skills.
      • Josh
        A big Congratulations to Josh and his family. He is a true winner all the way. I never had any doubt that he would win!!!
      • Cody what?
        Ok...not gonna bash Taylor Hicks (well then again, maybe I will a little, but I don't dislike him...I'm not Simon), but Lou brought him up for a reason...of all of the winners of these mostly silly, over the top, "talent" contests, Mr. Hicks is easily the least talented. Doesn't mean he's devoid of talent...but if you seriously think that Mr. Hicks is a better singer than Mr. Kaufman, you need to get some hearing aids pronto, because you are in need of a auditory specialist...as for performing skills, I will take Kaufman's unpretentious "let the song do the talking approach" any day...Hicks' histrionics as a performer are clearly meant to distract folks from the fact that his voice is pretty ordinary...he is the stuff of parody (Jason Sudekis' "Soul Patrol", Fallon, Julia Louis Dreyfus...Taylor's best attribute is his unfailing good humor, as he seems to be in on the jokes, and can laugh at himself)...he has a residence in Vegas for heavens sake, he's only been around for 8 years and he's already reached the end of the road, the music business is littered with people who were moderately talented at best who made a fortune, getting paid well in music doesn't necessarily equate with artistry and talent...as for Kaufman, he may not even fare as well as Hicks has career wise despite being obviously far more talented...the blue eyed soul thing is gonna have to make a larger comeback for him to score big...there are other singers as good or better (Allen Stone for one) already working that territory who are doing well but not getting rich, if that is the criteria we are going to use to judge the art...the original purveyors of that genre (white dudes with soul music and gospel influences), like Hall and Oates, Boz Scaggs, Michael McDonald, are still performing. The new music in that genre doesn't get a lot of airplay on the radio, or anywhere else...winning one of these contests doesn't necessarily guarantee success...I wish him luck and I hope he can ride his current notoriety to wherever he wants to go...I know several people who know him, and by all accounts he is a terrific person.

      Post a comment to this blog

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

      2. If you only knew....

      3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

      4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

      5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

      ADVERTISEMENT