Notes on nudity: Splitting hairs on 'Hair'

July 3, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

On July 5, Bobdirex opens its production of “Hair” at the Athenaeum.

And since producer/director Bob Harbin announced the show (shortly after closing his hit production of “Monty Python’s Spamalot” last summer), I’ve been hearing will-they-or-won’t-they chatter about the show’s infamous nude scene…along with misinformation about what exactly that scene is about.

First of all, for those of you who only know about “Hair” secondhand, be advised that the scene isn’t prurient nor sexual at all—at least not in productions I’ve seen.

Yes, “Hair” is set in a world where “free love” was one of the mantras and traditional partnering was only one option when it came to love and/or sex. And there are plenty of other places in the show where traditional coupling isn’t the only configuration.

But that’s not what the scene is about.

The scene takes place at the end of the first act, during a song called “Where Do I Go.” In it, a young man, Claude, is wrestling with what he should do about being drafted. Is it really worth dying for your county when your country doesn’t seem to care about you and your generation? Whatever you think of the Vietnam War, the musical asks you to identify with the torment of this guy. And when other members of his tribe of friends join in, we see those feelings multiply exponentially. He isn’t alone in asking this question.

Later in the show, the tribe wonders “How dare they try to end this beauty?” and, still later, they morph Shakespeare’s line “the rest is silence,” pleading with the world to understand that this body is all we have here and to waste it is beyond criminal. Those lyrics connects to what we’ve been hearing from the beginning of the play—songs that celebrate and wrestle with the frailty of the human body.

In the midst of “Where Do I Go,” we see those bodies—lots of them—unadorned.

And if the scene works, it’s deeply moving.

The problem with nudity on stage, of course, is that it can distance the audience from the theatrical experience, making us aware of these people as actors rather than characters. But in a good production of “Hair,” that doesn’t really matter. If the moment—and it really isn’t much more than a moment—works, the distinction between character and actor blurs as we see them as people in all their limited, beautiful, searching selfness.

And if you are more shocked by the nudity than you are by the fact that more than 58,000 of Claude’s peers were killed during the Vietnam War, then you’ve missed the point of “Hair” completely.

Note: While I have to miss opening weekend, I’ll be catching “Hair” in its second week at the Athenaeum. Look for a review shortly thereafter.

Oh, and if I see you take out your cell phone camera doing the show, I may upend your seat with you on it. You've been warned.

  • Thanks!
    Thanks for this, Lou! You said it beautifully. Will certainly share with FB!
  • Right on!
    "And if you are more shocked by the nudity than you are by the fact that more than 58,000 of Claude’s peers were killed during the Vietnam War, then you’ve missed the point of “Hair” completely." That says it all. Great commentary, Lou!
  • Hair
    thanks for the distinctions Lou ... and you're hired as bouncer for the show ... harbin
  • Well said
    Lou, well said. The scene is brief and if you blink you will miss it, but it is also powerful when done right. It is not about "Gratuitous Nudity" -- if you want that, go see "Naked Boys Singing". I will be attending the Sunday show with my in-laws and my mother for mom's birthday. I admit, my opinion of the show will be biased since I know someone in the cast. That said, I am certain it will be spectacular.
  • Thoughtful review.
    Well written Lou...glad to see you'll be strong-arming the cell phone addicts...long overdue. Example: 2012 performance of the "Crucible" at Anderson's Mainstage. John Proctor (on hands and knees, imploring): "You have taken my soul, leave me my name!"...dramatic pause interrupted by the ringing of audience member's cell phone...there oughta be a law...on a better note looking forward to this production of "Hair", thanks again Lou...

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.