REVIEW: "Hair" at the Athenaeum

July 11, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

There are worse problems to have in theater than an audience so enthusiastic about what they are seeing and hearing that their hooting and hollering dampens the emotional impact of the end of your show. But that’s what happened when I caught Bobdirex production of “Hair,” playing at the Athenaeum through July 20.

Yes, there are moments when this “Hair” knocks the vocals out of the park—in Craig Underwood’s joyful “My Conviction,” in Claire Wilcher’s “Easy to Be Hard,” and in the Tribe’s “Three-Five-Zero-Zero” and “The Flesh Failures,” to name just a few. Its onstage band—led by Trevor Fanning (doing double duty as both music/vocal director)—is terrific and I was lucky enough to see the show on a night when music from the Athenaeum’s biergarten wasn’t competing with the production.

But “Hair” is more than a concert. And director Bob Harbin’s cast and crew brought more than just great sound. One of the challenges of the show is that, for maximum effect, personalities have to pop on stage. The actors aren’t given pages of script to work with to create their characters. Yet rather than being background players, I felt a familiarity even with some of the nameless members of the tribe (among them Arianne Villareal, Julie O’Mara, and Tawj Monroe).

Hair
All photos are by Rick Randjelovic

I also was pleased to see that Harbin didn’t try to fit his lead actors into pre-existing molds. For instance, Lincoln Slentz’s Berger came across less pushy and more stoner than I’ve seen him before. That partly stems from Harbin’s choice to, for the most part, keep his tribe out of the audience. But it also comes from allowing Slentz to bring his own interpretation of Berger to the table.

By not putting Berger in the driver’s seat, the tribe seemed more a gang of approximate equals, leaving room for the wonderfully present Tyler Ostrander (as Woof) and the playful Rashida Bonds (as Dionne) to have more time at the core of the action than is usually the case.  Wilcher’s Sheila doesn’t confine her “Easy to Be Hard” sadness to her solo—she seems to clearly know the flaws of her friends and knows what forgiving Berger’s harshness takes from her. Anthony Snitker (previously in Civic’s “Into the Woods”) leaves more of a mark here than he has previously—I wish I could say we’d see more of him here, but after this show he’s off to Los Angeles. And, in the loveliest few minutes of the show, I believed wholeheartedly that Audrey Brinkley’s Crissy met a boy called Frank Mills in front of the Waverly.

(And, yes, there is nudity. For my thoughts on that, visit my earlier blog post here.)

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT