Alone on stage

September 10, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A full house greeted Butler University visiting artist Tim Hardy for the first of a two-show-only stint in Nick Young’s one-man play “Galileo” (Sept. 9-10). It wasn’t just the size of the audience and the quality of the performance that I found inspiring. It was also the presence of a number of local actors and other creative types in the crowd.

Seeing this level of excellent work can be intimidating, but I hope that it also proves inspiring. Hardy—a faculty member of the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art who appeared in such landmark productions as Peter Brook’s “Marat/Sade” and Peter Hall’s “Henry V”—created a weary, funny, sad Galileo angry at himself for misjudging the forces against him.

His explanation of the power of the rack as a torture device effectively painted a flesh-and-blood picture of the consequences of his alleged heresy. It brought humanity to his brilliance, taking this from history lesson to a strong evening of theater.

Even though you are too late to catch this one, the '09/'10 Indy theater season will feature other one-person shows. Such presentations raise a number of questions that I thought I'd bounce off you:

Do you feel that these minimalist shows -- the IRT is presenting three of them later in the season -- should have the same ticket price as fuller-cast productions?

John Leguizamo recently tried out his new one-man show here. Mike Bribiglia, who scored an off-Broadway hit with his "Sleepwalk With Me" will be in town next week. What is the line between a stand-up act and a one-person play?

Indy Fringe and Storytelling Arts have presented many one-person monologists locally. Is storytelling the same as theater?

Your thoughts?

  • It's Birbiglia. I saw "Sleepwalk with Me," and it was very entertaining, but definitely straddled the thin line between stand-up and "theatre." I also saw Lily Tomlin's revival of "The Search for Signs of Intelligent Life in the Universe," and that was most definitely a PLAY. I think the difference may be in the way a show is shaped. I did not see "The Year of Magical Thinking," but that struck me as a stupid idea for a one-person show. I see no reason why the tickets should be cheaper for a play with only one person in the cast, although it is very obvious that theatres stage these (especially IRT) to save money.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...