Thoughts on the 'Fame' remake

September 24, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One of the refreshing elements in the remake/rethinking of "Fame" (which IBJ ticket winners sneak previewed on Sept. 23) is that success doesn't come to everyone who dreams. Even those who work hard don't always get the payoff.

I won't reveal any of the film's minor surprises, but I will say that it exceeded my expectations, despite losing some of its energy and interest in the last quarter. The film makes a rare case to its core teen audience that a career in the performing arts is serious business.

I was impressed that the film spent so much time on the school auditions (even though the sequence contained failed efforts at cheap laughs) and appreciated the smart nods throughout to the previous film (including a key performance of "Out Here on My Own"). Well-played performances by the grown-ups, particulary Charles S. Dutton and Megan Mullally, and an overall sense of grubbiness helped keep this from seeming like a "High School Musical" cash-in.

So were you there? Your thoughts?

  • Having never seen the original, I feel as though I was not biased towards it.

    I thought the movie did an excellent job showing the journey through highschool and ultimately the desire for FAME. The ups and downs in the movie made it more real. I hate nothing more than watching a movie that is happy, happy, happy. Overall the movie is good and I highly recommend it.

    P.S. I was highly amused by your daughter and her group of friends before the film! Ah, to be young :)

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by